Jump to content
When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission.
  • Current Donation Goals

Rolex WM9 v2, three years later


By-Tor

Recommended Posts


0.jpg

After a long hiatus I decided to make another pictorial. I haven't purchased any watches since the B01, which I have sold already.

I only have a few replica watches left. One of the keepers is the WM9 Sub v2, which is now a combination of different parts & mods. I've been wearing it a lot in the past 3 1/2 years and the small ETA 2671-2 has been a reliable and accurate workhorse.

I also had my "big watch season" just like many other members, but in the end of the day 40-42 mm might be my favorite watch size anyway.

I bought this watch from bklm1234 when the model was brand new. I think I was among the first ones who received it. When I got married a few years ago, BK sent me better crown and genuine insert as a wedding gift. That was a great gesture.

The main reason for my long hiatus is that I got married and bought a new house which required some work... and after my son was born, I didn't have much time for watches (or any other Internet activity for that matter). But recently I started to spend a little time on the forums again I found some great Sub pictorials (like THIS) by my longtime friend Watcher. Amazing! I was happy to find out that the members can purchase great Sub replicas again (TC). The old "spark" came back and I finally performed the mods.

1a.jpg

One of the biggest issues on all rep Rolexes is the bracelet. No matter how much you pour oil on it... and polish/wax it, it simply doesn't feel the same. This applies to WM9 v2 as well. I scratched my head on this and examined my gen bracelet 16710 very closely.

The gen has very "smooth" feel on it, which is partly due to the "rounded" edges on the bracelet. It has kind of a "bevel" there. I filed the edges from all corners, by using a metal file, then a soft nail file and finalized with a Scotch Brite-Pad (to get an even finish). Use a 45-degree angle when "sanding" the edges.

Here you can see the gen bracelet closeup (and the bevel). It's one of the main factors of the "soft" feel of the gen. Replica bracelet edges are usually very sharp and thus, feel quite different.

2a.jpg

The results are fantastic. Bracelet feels 95% like the gen now. The last 5% probably comes from a superior machinery & tolerances and different steel grade.

3.jpg

Mods performed:

WM v1 SELs
Genuine insert
Clark crystal
BK crown
Full bracelet treatment (includes excessive oiling, waxing and shaping)


The new genuine insert is a great addition. So is the BK crown which is pretty much identical with the gen.


88_zps7ca05e25.jpg

Actually I was going to buy a gen 16610 eventually but WM9 with mods is just too good. The only remaining issue now is the crown vertical position but I find it quite insignificant and not really noticeable. WM9 v1 SELs are the best fit for this particular model. Nicely recessed and fit like a glove.

4-1.jpg

I've owned reps and frankens of pretty much all classic Rolex models and only 16610 and 16710 remain the ones that still keep me excited. People say that 16610 is "too common" and somewhat unimaginative choice. But what can you do... it's perfect.

I don't find the new Rolex models desirable at all and (besides the 1675) I'm not a huge fan of the acrylic crystal-era vintages, either. This "5-digit Rolex era" is my favorite and 16610 & 16710 represent that era perfectly. And even with their faults (like flimsy clasps) they're (IMHO) the two coolest Rolexes ever made.

So... what more you could ask for? Besides a gen white 16750, perhaps. And maybe that watcher's LV? biggrin.png

2-2.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Great write up and great read BT, the watch looks fantastic. The final bit of smoothing around those bracelet edges is one of those things that should be done on most rep bracelets, even the good ones. It really adds that little bit of extra quality feeling and is well worth the effort.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good lord that first photo is fantastic!! How do you get your light source so soft and even? How much photoshop processing are you doing?

Thanks man.

You can't make a bad photo good with Photoshop, but you can enhance a good source photo. And when the source pic is good not much PS'ing is needed. Good watch photo is 85% about the lighting, 14% is Photoshopping and 1% is about the camera.

All good watch photographers use Photoshop. People who say stuff like "I'm doing everything with the camera" are all lying... or then their pics look like crap. :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The tc v3 bracelet is great in case you want to try it.

That's what I heard. But I'm pretty happy standing pat with this. WM9 v1 SELs fit perfectly and "smoothing" the edges really made the trick. :good:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's what I heard. But I'm pretty happy standing pat with this. WM9 v1 SELs fit perfectly and "smoothing" the edges really made the trick. :good:

Good to see you back BT

I hope you get a chance to see the newest TC bracelet in person, it is levels above and beyond the other rep bracelets.

The printing, the fonts, the coronet, the steel edges...even the way the clasp opens and closes is just amazing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...
Please Sign In or Sign Up