Jump to content
When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission.
  • Current Donation Goals

How to tell a T19/T17/T39 superdome xtal is gen or rep (?)


dbane883

Recommended Posts

When it comes to sourcing NOS vintage tropic superdomes for subs/sea dwellers, the toughest ones to find are the T19, T17, and the T39 (in that order).

There are the occasional posts in VRF and on eBay that claim that the crystal for sale is genuine. With so many good aftermarket crystals, how can you tell its gen or not? Even the so-called "experts" are fooled routinely.

Well, as I worked on a big crown build for lionsandtigers, I discovered something that might be helpful.

As you may already know, the crystals are/were made in layers... Some of the cheap rep crystals are made in a single layer. Occasionally, you can see the concentric rings under the base of the sidewalls. But this can be difficult to see. But if you hold the crystal with the sunlight hitting it at an oblique angle, it's possible to see the layers as such:

72736d27b7e044cb56db4eb1ef0ed0bb.jpg

This in and of itself may not be a tell that it's genuine. If there are no rings, then I would avoid it for sure.

But some reps, like the CWP T19, also show these rings.

So what I discovered yesterday was that all gen superdomes distort around the outer areas that stretches outward. Looking at text while holding the lens can display the distortion I'm talking about like this (in this case a gen T17):

10f0cdb5176b1adfcef81a5ebe4fa733.jpg

But I tested this with a few rep superdomes I had lying around. The result was completely different. While the dome profile may be perfect, the distortion is way off on the edges. Text seems to curl around in a toroidal fashion creating two assymetric rings of text on either side of the crystal. Here's a T19 from Michael a Young at CWP, arguably the most popular aftermarket tropic superdome:

598e8ae37cb26b870fbef304749b112f.jpg

Note how the text goes circular on either side; something that does not occur on gen superdomes. I tried this with a known gen T19 and T39 superdomes with similar results.

While this may not definitive, the absence of the visible acrylic layers and/or presence of circular text distortion are probably signs that you just bought a fake crystal that's worth no more than $20.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No worries my friend! I will admit my ignorance to the world here, I didn't know gen crystals were made up of layers. And that explains the layers I see in my gen t-17!

Keep up the good work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting, the clarity is quite noticeable between the two as well.

Thanks for the information. I can definitely see the rings on my 16750 plexi in the sunlight.

Sent from my droptop using telepathy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I can't seem to find a gen t19 that's in my budget, would the CWP one be around $100 and is it worth it in you're opinion ?

Thanks

 

I bought my Gen T19 Service Cystal for $99 from my watchmaker.  

If you need one, I can ask him if he has more.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On June 25, 2015 at 9:32 AM, Dlf said:

I can't seem to find a gen t19 that's in my budget, would the CWP one be around $100 and is it worth it in you're opinion ?

Thanks

 

The question is, do you want the flatter "service" crystal or the vintage dome?

 

I smashed the gen Superdome 39 on the Frosty Flake and had to find a replacement.  I tried the MY domed T19 and it's really nice.  The profile isn't quite right, it's a little flat at the zenith.  The distortions are a little too "ringed" around the perimeter too, but it's very clear and sparkly.  :tu:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The CWP T19 is about $70 plus shipping...  Its a superdome profile and the best aftermarket one that I have seen or used.  Definitely worth the money.

 

 

 

A gen service crystal does not have the same profile, but great if the single radius profile is what you prefer.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's going on my pcg build, I like the flat look personally as most aftermarket I've bought are too round on the edges for my taste, but still can't decide which would look better as Its a really old sub refrence, maybe the CWP would be the best choice?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for this info, we can't have enough references duplicated or not. Please don't refrain from posting becuase there might be a historical post, every new view point is a valid one !!!

One thing that I feel is confusing currently is the repeated reference as Michael Young as CWP. Why is this? If we look at his web site it clearly states CLASSIC WATCH REPAIR. where as Clarks routinely refers to himself as CLARKS WATCH PARTS which is also routinely abbreviated to CWP. So when we have a post that includes references to Michael Young and Clarks at the same time it is hugely confusing. Can we agree to reference Michael Young as CWR or am I missing something?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One thing that I feel is confusing currently is the repeated reference as Michael Young as CWP. Why is this? If we look at his web site it clearly states CLASSIC WATCH REPAIR. where as Clarks routinely refers to himself as CLARKS WATCH PARTS which is also routinely abbreviated to CWP. So when we have a post that includes references to Michael Young and Clarks at the same time it is hugely confusing. Can we agree to reference Michael Young as CWR or am I missing something?

From their webpage:

"Classic Watch Repair is the latest venture of www.classicwatchparts.com "

So CWP has been around since the old days.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for this info, we can't have enough references duplicated or not. Please don't refrain from posting becuase there might be a historical post, every new view point is a valid one !!!

One thing that I feel is confusing currently is the repeated reference as Michael Young as CWP. Why is this? If we look at his web site it clearly states CLASSIC WATCH REPAIR. where as Clarks routinely refers to himself as CLARKS WATCH PARTS which is also routinely abbreviated to CWP. So when we have a post that includes references to Michael Young and Clarks at the same time it is hugely confusing. Can we agree to reference Michael Young as CWR or am I missing something?

In dbane's opening post he writes "Here's a T19 from Michael a Young at CWP". To my recollection, 'Michael Young', 'Classic Watch Parts' and 'CWP' have always been synonymous, meant the same source. I don't think I've ever read anyone here refer to Clark's as anything but 'Clark's' or the man himself, Gary Clark.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've tried both the MY and Clarks versions of the T19 on Cartel 5513s. The Clarks makes the rehaut look too large/wide imho. If you're looking for a rep T19 Superdome, MY is the best choice. If you're looking for a flatter profile go for the gen T19 service crystal.

5513 with Clarks T19:

9362dedd8aacacc9579a514bb76cf824.jpg

Same 5513 with MY T19

dcc46b55aa1b625989c20985df495913.jpg

.... 1665 with MY T39

7f118978972227513223b1e9352a2a2e.jpg

... and a 5513 with a gen T19 service crystal

333312f86c26721a419304ff955e36ed.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agreed. Clark's parts have always been referenced as Clark since I've been on the forums, and I first started reading in summer of 2008. I've never once seen him referred to anything other than his name.

Michael Young is always MY or CWP even on the gen boards. He's rep friendly but serves the gen community. I don't find it confusing at all. He runs two businesses. Classic Watch Repair is his service and repair business, and Classic Watch Parts is his parts business. Pretty easy to tell the difference, in my opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From their webpage:

"Classic Watch Repair is the latest venture of www.classicwatchparts.com "

So CWP has been around since the old days.

 

 

Ok well this explains a lot... fair enough... so as long as Clarks is never referred to as CWP we have no issues :-) lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

After the MY crystal split around the rehaut a couple of times a few weeks after being installed on two occasions. I decided to replace it with a used gen T19 service crystal. Maybe the plastic used in the MY production is too brittle. The retaining ring wasn't overly tight, only requiring gentle pressure to hold the crystal in place. Anyhow, here's the 5513 with the gen T19 service crystal.

b0e69185c788d38c5ed36bfb3a3c64fb.jpg

d978688e148218ce88f0294ce4832cd2.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...
Please Sign In or Sign Up