denimhead Posted September 20, 2016 Report Share Posted September 20, 2016 http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/252503833005?euid=7c2588921d0649be91188c779ef1f93b&bu=43810863951&cp=1&exe=12742&ext=32470&es=3&nqc=EGAAAAAAAAAAAABACAAQAEAAAAEABAAAAAAAQAAAGAAAAAAAAAABAABAAAgRAAAAASAAAAAAIAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAACAAAEAECEIAAEABAAAACAAAABQAAAAABAAAABIABAABAAAAAAQAAAAAAABA*&nqt=EGAQAAAAAAAAAABACAAQAEAAAAEABAAAAAAAQAAAGAAAARIAAAIBQABAAAgRAAAAASAAAAAAIAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABACAAAEAECEIAAEABAAAACAAAABQAAAAABAAAABIABAABAAAAAAQAAAAAAABA*&ec=1&sojTags=es=es,nqc=nqc,nqt=nqt,ec=ec,exe=exe,ext=ext,bu=bu Wasn't sure what to report here, so could do with your expertise before i push the button. The bracelet is defo a rep xvii bracelet, but is the xvi watch a rep too? Crown too big?? Box set also looks rep to me, Dont want to see someone get stung Cheers Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ryaku Posted September 21, 2016 Report Share Posted September 21, 2016 Not sure if the seller changed pictures but it seems all legit to me. The ss bracelet is not from a XVII but it might come from a UTC version (endlinks are thicker). I am saying that because the fitment doesn't look perfect but it might be caused by wrong springbars too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fireman_Fred Posted September 21, 2016 Report Share Posted September 21, 2016 I'm no expert on IWCs, rep or otherwise but the seller has 223 x 100% feedback and he is selling a number of high end, expensive watches (including a Daytona and a DSSD), so I'm inclined to think he would be mad to attempt to slip a rep in there ! Just my tuppence worth. Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andyaudi42 Posted September 21, 2016 Report Share Posted September 21, 2016 bracelet is rep for sure. there shouldn't be any spring bar holes in the clasp portion of the bracelet. you can see two holes on the clasp, one on button release side, and the other on the flat side. SEL Fitment is also garbage. I've had 2 3717s on bracelet and the Mk XVI, neither had the holes in the bracelet, not the poor fitting endlinks (which are solid, and dont offer much wiggle room). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ryaku Posted September 21, 2016 Report Share Posted September 21, 2016 bracelet is rep for sure. there shouldn't be any spring bar holes in the clasp portion of the bracelet. you can see two holes on the clasp, one on button release side, and the other on the flat side. SEL Fitment is also garbage. I've had 2 3717s on bracelet and the Mk XVI, neither had the holes in the bracelet, not the poor fitting endlinks (which are solid, and dont offer much wiggle room). My bad, you are absolutely right, bracelet is rep Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.