Craig S

Not playing the game on this one. Gen is relatively affordable, so if it's off, I'm not interested. To be honest, I've been put off reps in general for this very reason. Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk 2

Might actually go gen on this one, unless the rep surprises me. Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk 2

There are about three dealers I know of in UK. I bought a herb black bay about a month ago whilst in London. Usa is where you will have problems getting one. Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk 2

Good work mate! Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2

I'm waiting until they resolve some of the blatant flaws. People may say dine are a bit ODD about the flaws, but buying this rep is almost a week's wage for me in my case. Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2

Has there been a rough release date for the v2 LV anybody know?

The liquid metal logo on the case back does bother me. Another prime example of the factories placing flaws deliberately in order that we end up buying v2 v3 etc. It takes the p1ss if you ask me. They get 99.9 of a watch correct then screw up on something as simple as a pearl in example. I've stopped buying reps with obvious tells these days. Would rather save up towards a gen. Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2

Don't blame you mate. That watch is advertised as having "no happy feet" so if you ordered the item and it comes with happy feet, then it's not as advertised and not a fault. He should replace it without question. Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 2

I might buy one when they sort the caseback engravings. Other people might not care, but a lot of people on here will. Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2

It's another case of placing flaws in the rep so we buy v2 v3 etc. Very tiring... come on GZ, we aren't fcking stupid. Just make what we want, reap the benefit and move on to the next rep. Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2

Just noticed the 45 version has "liquid metal" on case back. This isn't correct at all.... Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2

Not a fan of the old school (pre ceramic) black sub but the old school Sub LV, i would say TC V1 LV. Clasps on some of these TC reps are a bit crap mind. The latest SubC on Josh's site looked great until i realised the text on the dial (Officially certified) has no bloody gap in it! http://www.1-pc8838.com/rlss00008-116600-submariner-p-13285.html Looks nice apart from that. I really can't understand why they can replicate a watch, doing all the hart parts like case pearl etc, and then miss something so obvious. My only guess is they are there deliberately to make us keep buying new reps. I'm still on the lookout for a good SubC LV rep with the correct sunburst dial, but still nothing decent on the market Happy to be proven wrong, but I doubt I will be..

Wiz (Etienne) in France

Maybe I just need mine straightened. The cyclops appears to be in place, but it is quite difficult to make out date underneath due to reflections. Right hand of the datewheel text appears to be in shadow, although the datewheel is definitely centred.

Mines the noob. I'm sure someone had a source for replacement crystals. Not gen but better quaility, similar to clark for the rollies. I wish I could remember who posted it now.... grrr I can imagine a gen crystal would be very expensive inded.