elepaolo

No, the subdial position is completely different, whether is a 16520 (rolex 4030 movt) or a 116520 (rolex 4130 movt)

You talk about your relatives... I wish you could meet mine! (free adapt from "Eyesight to the Blind" by The Who) ;)

Simply an embarassing display of incredible superiority by Money. The greatest of this era, one of the best 20 boxers P4P of all times.

Having the same problem here. He's not responding to me too...

One of the ugliest watches I've ever seen. Period.

UNBELIEVABLE. One of the most beautiful rep I've ever seen (and I've seen quite a lot). Mighty Z., if one day you'll ever decide to part with it, you know who to call!

I guess (actually strongly believe) that the dial is not from the original watch!

Well, if it has lug holes, than the dial should be tritium, not luminova. At the bottom of the dial it should bear "swiss t<25",thus.

Well, St Exupery is mine!

PM for you N, for the BB and St Ex

The gen dial makes a world of difference. The rep dial has not the thicker markers at 5, 10, 15 and on, just to spot the most evident flaw...

Eh, mi sa che sarà dura... Translation It's gonna be tough...

Ok guys, I know I'm looking for something really hard to find, but you never know... I'm in desperate need of a 16520 case, and I'd pay top money for it, as I'm on the way to build a Daytona El Primero (already have the movt and bracelet, I'm buying dial and hands now). I know that George from Greece (not WM9) used to sell them, and somebody may still have some...Anybody know any other source (please don't suggest J&W, I already know, but the price is crazy)? Or, if you happen to have one, I'm here!

Sell it to me, sell it to me, sell it to me!

Dial and crown are gen for sure, all the rest I don't know (need more pics). However, CGs seem ok, lugs are the proper size and have the proper brushing, so my bet is 100% gen.