Jos Nana Posted March 9, 2012 Report Share Posted March 9, 2012 Coming soon Next Week !!! Titanium Automatic Pam 240 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Londongeorge87 Posted March 9, 2012 Report Share Posted March 9, 2012 For f***s sake. Another one on the shopping list. Looks great. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flim Posted March 9, 2012 Report Share Posted March 9, 2012 Very nice watch! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rolexman Posted March 9, 2012 Report Share Posted March 9, 2012 Nice. 40mm? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronin Posted March 9, 2012 Report Share Posted March 9, 2012 Nice. 40mm? 44mm Video showing "push button" quick change Strap system that this watch has/should have. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UjbDhQbJzW0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
penerai1950 Posted March 10, 2012 Report Share Posted March 10, 2012 Rep Pams are getting better and better... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
panermaniac Posted March 10, 2012 Report Share Posted March 10, 2012 Hey Ronin, is the guy in the video a friend of yours? If so, can you ask him why he chose to pair a shiny DLC buckle with a titanium watch. I would like to know because I think it looks kinda strange. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ktirio2010 Posted March 10, 2012 Report Share Posted March 10, 2012 http://www.network54.com/Forum/353391/thread/1215232173/Repost+and+Update.....+Sapphire+crystal+%2BTi+scratch+removal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lfovco Posted March 10, 2012 Report Share Posted March 10, 2012 at first it looked exciting but then I looked a bit closer and in comparison to let's say 390 that only has 3 flaws, this one has more then 10. And both are from H factory. I'd say that this one being newer is a huge step back in accuracy. Main lume font is too thin. Name font is too thin and also has inconsistent spacing between letters. Especially word Marina is pretty bad. CP is wrong, crown does not look right, lever tip shape is off, CG pin is incorrect, bottom of the lever spacing is still off. Strap lugs are way off, the back is completely incorrect, etc. 390 had only 3 issues out of he ones listed. So I wonder why they would pay so much less attention to details this time. That said, this is still a really nice rep worth considering. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rapsody Posted March 11, 2012 Report Share Posted March 11, 2012 at first it looked exciting but then I looked a bit closer and in comparison to let's say 390 that only has 3 flaws, this one has more then 10. And both are from H factory. I'd say that this one being newer is a huge step back in accuracy. Main lume font is too thin. Name font is too thin and also has inconsistent spacing between letters. Especially word Marina is pretty bad. CP is wrong, crown does not look right, lever tip shape is off, <acronym title='Crown Guard'>CG</acronym> pin is incorrect, bottom of the lever spacing is still off. Strap lugs are way off, the back is completely incorrect, etc. 390 had only 3 issues out of he ones listed. So I wonder why they would pay so much less attention to details this time. That said, this is still a really nice rep worth considering. Big Thanks! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FxrAndy Posted March 11, 2012 Report Share Posted March 11, 2012 Jos any chance of the Ti bracelet with the correct taper for this one??? make it a 296????????? please!!!!!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tanya Posted March 11, 2012 Report Share Posted March 11, 2012 Main font is fine you are way off brother Main lume font? If you mean the lume on the dial again you are off Lever tip will always be off on any rep it and will always need a bit of TLC and the H fact levers are not good out of the box Spacing between letters is off?? LOL No it is not CP wrong?? No it is not, you are looking at reflection newbie Man I love how Noobs who have never seen the gen (let alone prob any genuine Panerai) get all fired up over macro pictures and proclaim themselves experts Truth is this rep is about perfect and with some CG work could match up with MY GEN 296 without scrutiny LOL Noob at first it looked exciting but then I looked a bit closer and in comparison to let's say 390 that only has 3 flaws, this one has more then 10. And both are from H factory. I'd say that this one being newer is a huge step back in accuracy. Main lume font is too thin. Name font is too thin and also has inconsistent spacing between letters. Especially word Marina is pretty bad. CP is wrong, crown does not look right, lever tip shape is off, CG pin is incorrect, bottom of the lever spacing is still off. Strap lugs are way off, the back is completely incorrect, etc. 390 had only 3 issues out of he ones listed. So I wonder why they would pay so much less attention to details this time. That said, this is still a really nice rep worth considering. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lfovco Posted March 11, 2012 Report Share Posted March 11, 2012 Your response is very immature, and makes me feel very sorry for you. I have been dealing with Gen Models way before you were even able to spell Panerai. And if you cannot see the flaws, that's great for you. Time to get some Gen glasses. Main font is fine you are way off brother Main lume font? If you mean the lume on the dial again you are off Lever tip will always be off on any rep it and will always need a bit of TLC and the H fact levers are not good out of the box Spacing between letters is off?? LOL No it is not CP wrong?? No it is not, you are looking at reflection newbie Man I love how Noobs who have never seen the gen (let alone prob any genuine Panerai) get all fired up over macro pictures and proclaim themselves experts Truth is this rep is about perfect and with some <acronym title='Crown Guard'>CG</acronym> work could match up with MY GEN 296 without scrutiny LOL Noob Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
statikman Posted March 11, 2012 Report Share Posted March 11, 2012 I do think it's interesting that on virtually all the important shots the gen is in sharp focus and the rep is blurred. For me, the dial stuff is meaningless. Until they nail the CG they are obviously reps from a mile away. Flush with no gaps at the lever please! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
seafoam Posted March 12, 2012 Report Share Posted March 12, 2012 Your response is very immature, and makes me feel very sorry for you. I have been dealing with Gen Models way before you were even able to spell Panerai. And if you cannot see the flaws, that's great for you. Time to get some Gen glasses. +1. Lighten up man... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
babola Posted March 12, 2012 Report Share Posted March 12, 2012 Time spanky-spanky...Tania hahaha! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bumroxas Posted March 14, 2012 Report Share Posted March 14, 2012 This looks promising..always loved the Ti look. Maybe after some TLC the CG's will look like this Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.