Legend Posted October 20, 2013 Report Share Posted October 20, 2013 For those interested, I saw that the "ultimate" (usually this means significantly more accurate than the "basic" version) is available for pre-order now. It looks like this is a product of the new Z factory, which produced the PAM 351. http://www.pureti.me/product/pre-order-pam389-o-zf-11-best-edition-on-black-rubber-strap-p9000/ What do you guys think? I do not work for Puretime nor am I in any way associated with Angus and company. I am just here to share my find for those interested. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
colorao Posted October 20, 2013 Report Share Posted October 20, 2013 Looks so good, but I 'll wait for any reviews . In these years I learn to be patient. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mapman57 Posted October 20, 2013 Report Share Posted October 20, 2013 Oh no, why couldnt this be 44mm. ?........ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hardik315 Posted October 20, 2013 Report Share Posted October 20, 2013 Looks good. It's just pure-time I am afraid of... Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - now Free Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sgtguk Posted October 20, 2013 Report Share Posted October 20, 2013 Oh no, why couldnt this be 44mm. ?........ My sentiments exactly I better go do some more weights I reckon ! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sergio789 Posted October 20, 2013 Report Share Posted October 20, 2013 with 47mm in it, it'll look like a tower clock on my wrist. 44 max... sad. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Legend Posted October 21, 2013 Author Report Share Posted October 21, 2013 actually sgtguk and mapman, I think I sport a smaller wrist than you guys, at 6", and I still have 47mm and even a 53mm watch in my repertoire.. I guess its about the attitude more than the actual dimensional compatibility for me. Yes Clock on my wrist, but who cares? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike on a bike Posted October 21, 2013 Report Share Posted October 21, 2013 Shaking head my good friend, one day I will have to see one of these "clocks" on your wrist in person! My lord how well you could wear a vintage Rolex which looks like a child's toy on me.................. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Legend Posted October 21, 2013 Author Report Share Posted October 21, 2013 Shaking head my good friend, one day I will have to see one of these "clocks" on your wrist in person! My lord how well you could wear a vintage Rolex which looks like a child's toy on me.................. Mike my friend, your tastes ought to gravitate toward larger dials.. ever considered a U boat? Seriously a vintage submariner on you would look like a ladies dataejust. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike on a bike Posted October 21, 2013 Report Share Posted October 21, 2013 And so they do, but I hate the weight of large pieces. A watch should be worn as a beautiful unobtrusive partner not something I notice is there IMHO. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sergio789 Posted October 21, 2013 Report Share Posted October 21, 2013 it wont be that 'massive' carved out in Ti. Have asked PT to confirm size and its 47mm indeed. case closed... for me. I'll stick with my 243 for now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scotty Posted October 21, 2013 Report Share Posted October 21, 2013 Looks good for me. On the list!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
panadyne Posted October 21, 2013 Report Share Posted October 21, 2013 This is just the sub that I've been waiting for... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vootzilla Posted October 21, 2013 Report Share Posted October 21, 2013 And so they do, but I hate the weight of large pieces. A watch should be worn as a beautiful unobtrusive partner not something I notice is there IMHO. You know 389 is titanium, right? Its like feather on your wrist. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Legend Posted October 21, 2013 Author Report Share Posted October 21, 2013 You know 389 is titanium, right? Its like feather on your wrist. on his wrist it would be like a hummingbird feather Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sul Posted October 21, 2013 Report Share Posted October 21, 2013 (edited) Nice...but does gen have between cp and minute hand that tiny cap?! Really like that PAM model... but for me correct cp is very important, I can usually tell rep or not via CP quality... if of course rep is not modded. Edit: GEN does not have cap.... damn... cant buy that. gen: Edited October 21, 2013 by sul Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Legend Posted October 21, 2013 Author Report Share Posted October 21, 2013 Nice...but does gen have between cp and minute hand that tiny cap?! Really like that PAM model... but for me correct cp is very important, I can usually tell rep or not via CP quality... if of course rep is not modded. Edit: GEN does not have cap.... damn... cant buy that. gen: I am an idiot, when it comes to details like this.. can you explain please? Thank you Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sul Posted October 21, 2013 Report Share Posted October 21, 2013 (edited) I am an idiot, when it comes to details like this.. can you explain please? Thank you No you are not idiot, I am just too " anal" probably. But gen and all other pam reps, minute hand is tight around cp.Here if you will zoom in Z factory rep, between watch minute hand and cp is tiny free space, like a "ring" around cannon pinion between cp and hand. Zoom in then you will understand what I am talking about. Edited October 21, 2013 by sul Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Legend Posted October 22, 2013 Author Report Share Posted October 22, 2013 Thanks Sul for the enlightenment. It is indeed a very tiny flaw. How visible is the gap to you? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike on a bike Posted October 22, 2013 Report Share Posted October 22, 2013 Hmm light you say ,maybe try one 47 x what, did not see in the specs? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
indywatchguy Posted October 31, 2013 Report Share Posted October 31, 2013 Flavor Flaaaaav actually sgtguk and mapman, I think I sport a smaller wrist than you guys, at 6", and I still have 47mm and even a 53mm watch in my repertoire.. I guess its about the attitude more than the actual dimensional compatibility for me. Yes Clock on my wrist, but who cares? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Legend Posted October 31, 2013 Author Report Share Posted October 31, 2013 Flavor Flaaaaav Indeed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.