EricG.

I am in for 2 as well.

Is just the angle of the pic, same happens in the gen, actually the only flaw i can see, as many before pointed, is the missed gear down the dial, and we have to wait to se the serial number, should be xxx/1000

regards

King has some new pics. Serial number doesn't look to be 0001/1000. However the cyclops definitely looks cut off.

Am I the only one that thinks a good part of the cyclops is cut off?

Hey guys, long time on looker and rep owner finally making a post. Sorry for my ignorance but these watches really intrigued me and I have a few questions. How close are these things actually to the real deal, specifically the Daytonas? What flaws actually exist? If I were to buy one and take it to an expert (I wouldn't ever pass it off as genuine, I'm just curious) would he be able to tell that it isn't real for instance? I also assume that Rolex would know it isn't completely genuine, but based on what? Sorry if my questions were annoying but I'm pretty interested. Thanks!

I hope the safari date window is fixed sometime soon as well.