Jump to content
When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission.

lwgt

Member
  • Posts

    21
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by lwgt

  1. I'm thinking about purchasing a BCE and doing some mods if possible (gen dial and bezel) but need som help. Came across this site for Breitling parts: http://www.swisswatchstore.co.uk/products/Breitling-Parts (other shops offering Breitling parts out there?)

    IMG_2911.JPG

    Description:

    Breitling Cockpit Steel Bezel with Riders and Screws A49350

    Will this bezel fit a BCE and if so, which version? Also, which version if best if one are going to change the bezel and dial?

    Some help would be much appreciated!

  2. I'm constantly asking myself; "why", when witnessing abundances of this caliber, which creates a general dislike towards collecting reps too... I assume that the difference lays within this particular collector's possibility to really make a difference in this world with his capital, opposed to people collecting fairly inexpensive reps. In the end, people are starving, while this guy adorn his wrist with million of dollars(?)

    Sorry for the rambling - got a sickening feel in my gut :ph34r:

  3. Cool movement, I just dont think it goes with that watch. That style is best left simple.

    BTW, what's up with your sig? Buy real? What are you doing here?

    I assume he's sarcastic and rereferring to the campaign against replicas.

  4. Hi,

    I've been reading a lot about the lack of good 2254.50 reps around, so I've decided to "build" my own, but I need a good starting point, thus I'm creating this thread for suggestions of the best 2254.50 out there (the quality of the strap irrelevant - I'm going to wear on a nato strap)

    I'm not going to change the movement, just the essential exterior parts to make it more gen like, which would be a gen dial, gen hands, and maybe a crown. Anything else?

    After been searching for a good start, these two are, in my eyes, the best to start with (please correct me if I'm wrong):

    From trusty:

    43fa5bb73087874f19e367d0e23d8bd9.image.750x498.jpg

    7986666919f35356b55dd9f90b7cd3b2.image.750x498.jpg

    e7b598ae16c47269ddfa25b3ad9c87f2.image.750x498.jpg

    Link to the watch

    From timeshops.net

    1692-3587_sml1.jpg

    1692-3587_sml7.jpg

    Link to the watch

    Which is according to you the best to start with? The one from trust obviously has shorter hands etc. but that doesn't matter...

    Also, both claim to have MOVEMENT: Swiss ETA 2824-2 Automatic - is this correct or BS?

    How good, accurately wise, can they become if I use the aforementioned gen parts with any of these two watches?

    Any opinions?

  5. As I mentioned in my earlier post, I think BK is the best source for the WM9 products. There was a post I saw somewhere where he showed what he did to 'fix' a WM9 v2 Sub for another forum member that had gotten his directly from WM9. Mainly small things, but the end result was a better watch. Pricing is the same, so no reason not to go with BK.

    Thanky you tomhorn. I will try to find that post.

  6. "As far as i can tell through some pretty damn intense reading of this forum, WM9s rolex reps, once gone through BK's QC and mods, are the best avaliable."

    Should one order through BK instead of directly from WM9's site? I understand, from the above mentioned comment obviously, that BK QC's the watches... this is opposed to WM9 who are shipping without QC?

    Would appreciate if someone can clarify this.

    Thanks!

    Anyone? Don't want to start a new thread regarding this as I'm not comfortable with being crucified :p

    I'm asking because I've read comments like: "Also will do some much needed QC on the WM9." , referring to BK.

  7. "As far as i can tell through some pretty damn intense reading of this forum, WM9s rolex reps, once gone through BK's QC and mods, are the best avaliable."

    Should one order through BK instead of directly from WM9's site? I understand, from the above mentioned comment obviously, that BK QC's the watches... this is opposed to WM9 who are shipping without QC?

    Would appreciate if someone can clarify this.

    Thanks!

  8. Altough I had some bad luck on Chinese QC (the stem broke off, which is replaced by the dealer), this rep is among the most accurate ones I've ever seen. I used to own the gen and the only two flaws I see - apart from the fact that the hands are not really blued, but painted - is that the gen doesn't have AR at all and secondly the 'Swiss Made' should be half the size.

    Buy yourself a strap from the Watchboys, have it completely serviced by a watchmaker and it will wear like a gen!

    img1544qop.jpg

    img1546b.jpg

    Thanks for your answer! I've to say, from you photos, I've would easily take it as a gen, atleast at first glance. But as previous stated, there's something missing in the hands, although they look much better from you pictures. But I assume one cant expect the same quality in a $300 rep compared to a $2000 gen.

    I'm gonna pull the trigger B)

  9. Hi, first post on this great forum.

    I've been lurking on rep forums for quite some time now and I've finally decided that the above mentioned watch will be my first purchase. Unfortunately I haven't read a single review about it, just some short comments. It would be much appreciated if anybody could elaborate regarding the quality, write a review etc. Due to the absence of fuss about it, this could be beneficial for other potential Longines Moonphase buyers, wondering whether it's a good rep or not.

    From the pictures displayed it looks fantastic, except the hands that in my eyes looks plastically and not as refined as hands on the gen.

    Rep

    LONGINES-016.jpg

    LONGINES-016-1.jpg

    Gen

    L2.673.4.78.3.jpg

    From the pictures, they did a very good job with this one, with the exclusion of the hands? :huh:

×
×
  • Create New...
Please Sign In or Sign Up