relaxman

Crap I thought the font looked kinda cool. Different anyways.

Good ole Pismo. Man I thought u fell off the face of the earth. Ive enjoyed looking at Pismos pics for a long time.

The odd part about it is I justed visited that site by chance and randomly chose that auction out of all the others. Plain kookie

Thanks coofire, I knew I wasnt going nuts.

Awe man not poor ole Eddie. Give the poor chap a break, as you can see he has endured alot. I love the avatar by the way.

This i know tourby I mean this exact watch. I have seen those pictures posted on this forum or so it seems

Just breezing through looking at the pics (thats all I can do) and saw this watch. Isnt it one of our members? G 177h

Might work

Thanks TT Those pics gave me chills and a smile. G

Could have not said it better myself..... G

Home theater has always been a passion for me.

This old thing.... If someone could help the old relaman out with a white letter dial I sure would apperciate it G

One word Invicta. Reminds me of those silly photos where they put their watch on a celebs wrist take a photo hand them a check, never to be seen on the celebs wrist again. G

Hey Pho Ive had it for over a year now.Originally from king I believe with slight mods from Joe

and the bezel insert is a shade darker on the genuine

Six months ago I put my name on a waiting list for a Rolex LV not thinking anything would come of it until the phone rang today. After seeing it I couldn't resist. Here are some pictures of both the genuine and rep for your comparison. Some of the differences I noticed were dial font. The font on the genuine appears to be thinner and not as white. Rep almost looks better.Crown Guards but and easy fix. Date font is close but a little thicker on the genuine Date mags are the same. The rehaut, this is always what bugged me on the rep. It is narrower and has the visible plastic ring next to the crystal. Most of for mentioned differences are small and undetectable to the average Joe. G

Im with TTK on this on. You and your wallet will regret it.

Hey R Actually its a 16753 (1984-85) fresh from Rolex service. I f-ed up however. It had the matte finish dial I was told that it would be replaced with the same dial WRONG it now has the gloss dial. Made me mad. It is my favorite of the bunch. It looks so nice Im afraid to wear it.

When I see the pictures of the pretty reps I usually purchase them only to later purchase the genuine. Does this happen to anyone else? I would think if this where the norm, genuine watch manufactures would love reps. I like to purchase the reps but find that I don't wear them in public much for fear that I might get called out to which my reply would be "I have the real one at home" to which their reply would be "sure you do" lol. Here is a pic of my genuine and reps pictured happily together.

This I will own.

I owned a genuine MM20. I was actually the first I believe to have the hands replated in gold by Jack at IWW. Its a pretty cool watch. I owned it for @ 8 months before selling it for more than I paid for it. Would I buy another No. Over quailty was not bad but not much better than my EL fiddy for 3 times less money. I dont think the straps that came with it are all that either. I just mostly got caught up in the thrill of the chase in getting one from Ken Trading. Here is a link to my post on Big watch Forum back 2004 MM20

Isnt the sub dial at 9 oclock to large. All the pics of genuines Ive see have the sub dials all the same size.

Very nice my man!

What about all the dopes here who pay a premium to have the first PAM rep on the block. Good lord talk about stupid. Big money little money its all relative.