Jump to content
When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission.

jackagi

Member
  • Posts

    34
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by jackagi

  1. I recently contacted a trusted dealer about obtaining a V3, here is his reply:

    "The AP V3.. It is very badly flawed.. bad Hexagon holes on the bezel and bad lume application on the inner bezel.. I am not selling this unless it is sorted out by the maker... Also the maker lied about the watch being superlume.. It is never superlume..

    There will be a much better one coming soon.... I suggest you wait for that .."

    Any thoughts?

    I guess it was from Andrew or Josh :-)!?

  2. I need some advice from the Rolex pros on this board!

    TC is building me a Rolex submariner and as the insert of TC is far from perfect I am trying to source a gen insert for it! I already got an offer for a brand new one, but wanted to know what's the current price for gen inserts! Does anybody has some insight? Any help would be highly appreciated!

  3. I love these comparison threads (BTW - thanks Mikellem) and I usually don''t read them for humour, but come on! With a review of one watch we get a bunch of comments about how we have been "Deceived", the watch is full of "Flaws" real C3 wasn't used and we should "Wait for V2"

    As much as we all love the QC pics sent to us from the suppliers, really? Do you really think there is a factory with a quality control division keeping an eye on things. These watches are put together in a room that is dimly lit by the soft glow of a '70s style TV while the guy doing it is puffing on a clove ciggy with a bowl of noodles on his "Work bench ". Do you really think you can draw all these conclusions based on one watch?

    I ordered the noob 243L before the CNY and I am with unregistered on this one. Mine came with an awesome clear single sided AR'd crystal and the lume was as good as unregistered showed in his post compared to a gen with C3. I have watches AR'd by Chief and lumed by The Zigmeister to compare it to and I was stoked on how good the watch looked.

    As far as the lume goes I can't tell you what they used, but as per my usual routine I set my watch on the nightstand with my other watches (About six or or so other Gens or Reps re-lumed with C-3) and sure enough, when I woke in the morning, before I turned on the light, that 243l looked as bright as the rest, if not brighter as it is new. I was definitely happy with the discharge rate. If it wasn't C3 , could someone tell me what it is becuase I am going to request it be used on my next re- lume!

    What impressed me most was the quality of the fit, feel & finish all the way around. This is something that will never translate in pictures that are posted to the Web and viewed on a computer screen no matter how good the pictures are.

    Before we get all up in arms from one watch that was reviewed and claim we were "Deceived" and need a version 2, wouldn't it be prudent to remind ourselves these are Reps, not $8,000.00 Gens and there might, just might, be a few bad ones that make it through "QC"?

    Right now, from the people who actually own the watch, the count is one thumbs down and two thumbs up. Not so sure we need a V2, you just need a little luck. And after all, isn't that life when buying a Rep?

    I love my 243L and can't believe how far we have come in this little hobby of ours collecting "Fake" watches

    So true! We should not forget that we are talking about replicas!

×
×
  • Create New...
Please Sign In or Sign Up