+1, but if rules were broken regarding shared/multiple iDs, then I get why the action was taken.
But also just seems like, looking at it with fresh eyes on the outside as a newer member here (member on other rep boards 2+ years), that there's a bit of jealousy or knit picking from old established members and a talented new guy, whom is evidently very talented in doing complicated watch builds. You have to admit that you should judge his M2M sales behavior by satisfied buyers (which 20 seems like more than enough validation data points) and not speculative insights from those that have not had any M2M activity with him. Again, rules are rules and I understand the action taken, but from the outside looking in, seems like a bit of old establishment keeping the talented new guy out of the mix. Not taking sides but making an observation and just IMO of course.
Please don't ban me.