sophiecat

Does anyone know a reputable, rep-friendly Watchsmith in or around Toronto?

Precisely. These are my sentiments. I think that most reasonable and intelligent individuals would assume that someone seeking opinions about a specific $338 watch is NOT asking for the differences between the gen and rep to be highlighted. It would be far more reasonable to assume that an individual seeking such criticism and opinion is seeking a comparison between what has been advertised (in description and photos) and the actual product (watch) that will be shipped. As stated above, I am pleased with Puretime, find them to be professional and, morevover, would recommend them. These are, however, my feelings before having received the watch I have ordered; they are initial and provisional sentiments. Accordingly, though I fully anticipate that I will be completely satisfied and content upon receiving my watch, this may not be the case. As consumers, we demonstrate good faith, and believe/hope that dealers are entirely scrupulous and reciprocate this good faith. Consider, however, the following hypothetical scenario: QC photos could conceivably depict the best technically reproduced specific watch (possessed by the dealer) that has been ordered by a customer and NOT the actual watch that will be shipped. One of the many advantages to posting QC photos would be that perhaps one or more of the very knowledgeable and discerning members of the forum might recognize a particular, identifying feature of the watch in the photos that would lead them to a conclusion that would prove invaluable to the consumer making the initial inquiry and soliciting the assistance of this forum. I am not casting any aspersions; I am also not naive. A quick perusal of this forum yields the uncomfortable understanding that on occasion - however rare - dealers who were once designated "trusted" have lost this designation and have unfortunately proven otherwise...at the expense of credent forum members.

1) Got it...but what is the rationale behind this "suggestion"? And now for something unrelated... 2) The timegrapher results that I received for this watch seem excellent, with the possible exception of "Rate" info. Is it o.k. for a so-called "super rep" to have a daily rate deviation of +007 s/d ? In reading some posts from this forum, it seems that most are of the opinion that a seven second daily deviation is merely "acceptable", but certainly not "very good".

Hey brother, I'm a little confused. You have a link under each of your posts - "Ehi Noob, read this please" Go to this link. Look at #11 on your 01 July 2014 posting. It explicitly says that QC photos should not be posted. Please reconcile the apparent contradiction/inconsistency. Thanks.

I should have read the rules/etiquette of posting info. more carefully. I have removed the attached QC photos. I apologize!

I was just a little concerned about the inner bezel, between the 10 and 12. I not sure if this is just dirt (unpolished bezel) or pebbling.

First Post!!! I just received these quality control photos from Puretime. They will ship the watch within 24hrs unless I indicate that I think there is a problem with the watch. Beyond the basics, I'm not sure what I'm looking for. Could you please give me your opinions? Is there anything that anyone sees that might be of some concern? I hope that I have attached the images correctly. Thanks!!! P.S. I must say that Puretime has been very professional and prompt to date. I would certainly recommend them.