PAMman Posted October 21, 2006 Report Share Posted October 21, 2006 Check this link and compare the difference in thickness between the crowns of the PreA 1 and PreA 2, which were produced in the same series of the same year. Also compare the crowns of the two Ti's, the PAM 036 and the 040 which were of the same era. If this variation existed in reps of the same batches we would be moaning about QC lack of detail. http://www.network54.com/Forum/265104/thre...scans+of+Pams... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Watchmeister Posted October 22, 2006 Report Share Posted October 22, 2006 Oh how right you are. For instance, having seen Rolli's posts on all the watches he has added the crown to I could see that the new crown ;looks spot on on the 196 and way too thick on the 2893's. But that is true with all PAM parts. Look at the cyclops. No two models have the same size and magnification although they have gotten better over the years. That is what happens when a watch company makes none of its own parts. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HauteHippie Posted October 22, 2006 Report Share Posted October 22, 2006 That's a mouthwatering post. I don't think anything can stop me from buying a gen 177H.... Err except maybe reading a few more accounts of Panerai customer service. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.