Correct GEN Hands for 116520 Daytona

[wne]

Hello guys,

I'm still very unsure about the correct GEN Hands for a 116520 without Rehaut. (Will remove it because it looks ugly on the Noob).
Which Hands do I need - the thick or thin ones for a no rehaut daytona?

I read already that Rolex introduced the rehaut in 2007.. but thick hands was already assembled before like 2004?

Im really unsure as you can see.

Maybe someone who is into daytonas can help me!

Thank you

[wne]

So I just checked chrono24 Daytonas.
Every 116520 from 2005 until 2007  doesnt have Rehaut and 98% all Fat Hands.

I guess its the right combination then!

Edited February 3, 2019 by wne

[sputim]

In the end also a matter of taste. I prefer the small hands bc. it has a more vintage look to it. But again that‘s personal taste.

T


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[wne]

@sputim

so both would be  correct for the no rehaut version right? Thank you!

[sputim]

[mention=50919]sputim[/mention]
so both would be  correct for the no rehaut version right? Thank you!

Yup exactly. Most get interchanged in service so they become rarer probably.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk