archibald Posted July 19, 2007 Report Posted July 19, 2007 http://forums.timezone.com/index.php?t=tre...61796&rid=0 Buyers getting nervous "Makes me headache" says the seller. Aren't the materials supposed to be engraved between the lugs? Or not on the 41mm version? Movement looks good, but... Do I have to contact my new pen pal, Senor Biver, yet again?
Dutchy Posted July 19, 2007 Report Posted July 19, 2007 Looks gen to me. Date window is good, date font as well. The movement looks good indeed. Dunno about that materials written on caseback. But it looks very gen to me!!
anton Posted July 19, 2007 Report Posted July 19, 2007 This is indeed gen. Tells: 41mm BB uses an ETA 2894 movement. 44mm BB uses a ETA 7750 modified by LaJoux-Perret and Hublot (HUB44). The 2894 has a 25.6mm diameter whereas the 7750 has a 30mm diameter. hence, the rotor is smaller. And there had been ZERO reps of this edition to date (to my knowledge).
Dutchy Posted July 19, 2007 Report Posted July 19, 2007 41mm BB uses an ETA 2894 movement. 44mm BB uses a ETA 7750 modified by LaJoux-Perret and Hublot (HUB44). The 2894 has a 25.6mm diameter whereas the 7750 has a 30mm diameter. hence, the rotor is smaller. Interesting!! Thanks
CY0811 Posted July 19, 2007 Report Posted July 19, 2007 (edited) Our rep date box size looks pretty good...dont you think? Edited July 19, 2007 by CY0811
anton Posted July 19, 2007 Report Posted July 19, 2007 Our rep date box size looks pretty good...dont you think? Looks good to me. Only wish the modified configuration didn't cause a recessed datewheel, though.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now