Love My Sub Tw Classic!

[purspeed]

http://www.rwg.cc/members/index.php?showtopic=6107

This is one QUALITY piece. Having held other reps, this one has the feel and appearance of gen.

I don't know if it's my eyes or if the other reps have the R-Lex font too white/thick, but the print appears a little subdued. Your thoughts?

(it should be noted that this rep is about 1 year old and there are slight improvements on the new Classic from the pic's I see online)

Thanks!

[kanerich]

I had the TW best sub. Yes, the dial print was too faint. Oddly, depending on the lighting it would look fine, but in general it looked too light. I eventually gave it to my brother because it bugged me too much.

[Glitch]

Also had a TW classic. Always wanted to drill out the lugs hole to accept gen pins, but the holes are too close to the top edge, unlike gens. Always a dead giveaway, even though dial print, weight and rehaut are close to real specs.

[Craytonic]

Also had a TW classic. Always wanted to drill out the lugs hole to accept gen pins, but the holes are too close to the top edge, unlike gens. Always a dead giveaway, even though dial print, weight and rehaut are close to real specs.

Wow never noticed this, thanks for pointing it out.

[purspeed]

Win some, lose some. The flaws are acceptable to me, as most will never notice the hole pin size/location.