leitztozeiss Posted April 19, 2006 Report Share Posted April 19, 2006 See the offending auction HERE. Also, see pics from that auction below. The seller gives the old excuse of the watch being a gift, but know absolutely nothing about watches. Yeah right. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ubiquitous Posted April 20, 2006 Report Share Posted April 20, 2006 Gee, I wonder why he didn't het any bids?!?! Watch looks interesting. At first glance, because of the subdial layout, it looks like a piece of junk. But if you analyze the photos a bit you'll see: -Asymmetric pushers -Nice 571 end links -A dial with a coronet placed too high Hmmmmm... It is a very intriguing watch indeed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leitztozeiss Posted April 20, 2006 Author Report Share Posted April 20, 2006 An EE perhaps? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HighDef Posted April 20, 2006 Report Share Posted April 20, 2006 This is a 7750. I am not sure about the pusher. Does not look assymetric to me. hhmmm Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ubiquitous Posted April 20, 2006 Report Share Posted April 20, 2006 Have a look at that top pic. The spacing of the pushers is much more pronounced in that pic. The second pic shows it as well... But it's not as obvious. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest avitt Posted April 20, 2006 Report Share Posted April 20, 2006 Intriguing is right. That's not a triplock crown either. The dial says DW all over it, but for the wrong movement, almost as if someone used Photoshop to alter space/time and streeeeetch it a little. The fonts, the placement, the boldness, the misplaced coronet... Hmmmmmmm, then again the numerals in the subdials don't look "DW". Intriguing! It's junk but it's intriguing. The lumi dots are also too yellow for a DW... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest avitt Posted April 20, 2006 Report Share Posted April 20, 2006 The subdials are definitely spread out too wide, and yet, they don't come close to the dial's edge. (Unless the subdial hands are shorter than normal, the subs must be the correct diameter). To me, this means that this is probably a 40mm case. Those end links might be stamped "571", but I'll bet they're 20mm. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ubiquitous Posted April 20, 2006 Report Share Posted April 20, 2006 Difficult to say with the pics provided. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.