First of all
thanks to all of you about your comments its always a pleasure to hear from you .... but i will tell you the truth.
The GMT is gen
The sub is one that i have bought from PT time ago. and is a rep. I see that the 90 % of you have spotted it : -)
The pics was done badly, yes infact this was done for minimize the flaws.
Yesterday i was reading some posts related to one GMT II, and one guy that was asking us to tell about if his watch if it was a rep or a copy.
A lot of members, says that "there is not a question to do, obv its a fake" and its sound to me "you dumb" dont understand that this is fake go and hide under a BIG stone...
Then i remember long ago, when even me wasnt able to understand if a Rolly was a rep or gen may be because i was a young guy that cant afford a gen, and never seen one of it and even a bad fake looks like a gen, only because there was written Rolex on it.
I feel sad about that guy that was considered like a dumb, because its not like us that can spot a rep in 20 seconds.
Fortunately things changed... and yesterday i go and take one of mine GMT II, have spent 10 minutes taking some bad pics, get a Rolex gen box ... and post this thread near the gen GMT a fake gold Sub,
Why ? may be i was only a little tired and i want to smile a little ...
BUT basically to remember to all of us to be patient with the others... and see that however is not easy to see the difference between a rep and a gen, and do not expect that everybody know it by "GOD" illumination....
I really have to thanks the TRC and the RWG and some of the members that in a couple of years were with me very patient and tolerant all the time and explaining me a lot of thing that was obvious for them but completely new for me.
and i'm happy to call them friends...
thanks for the posting ... and i'm sorry for the joke ... i hope that nobody will UPSET with me it was only a joke...
bye
Rob