Jump to content
When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission.

eunomians

Member
  • Posts

    3,405
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    8

Everything posted by eunomians

  1. Never seen nor heard of any other reference aside from 1675 and 1655 that uses 1575. My 1675 was purchased new, ironically, the same year as you (1967). Oysterworld is incorrect (ask Mr. Dowling about the iterations of 1570 + 1575). You must keep in mind that Rolex might've used some leftover 1575 movements for the references mentioned at Oysterword.de but 1575 is not the 99% of the time correct movement for the stated reference models. Oysterworld has compiled all references that have been 'spotted' using the said movements. This has been discussed many times on VRF, Turf and T; and the data remains inconclusive to this day (expections to the rule, so to speak). The fact that your watch has 1575 is extremely unusual (but wholly possible). The fact that my 1675 (serial dated to IV '67) has a small GMT hand but is not a pointed guard 1675 is also just as unusual. To add to the confusion, most 1575 movements are marked "1570", not "1575" (the same goes for 1560 & 1565 movements). So, for general reference purposes, it's best to accept the general rule of thumb with Rolex. And, to add to this, we must also accept that Rolex broke these rules as they saw fit: Parts caches were used up as they were found. That is why you see some 5513 with 1530 movements instead of 1520, or a late 60s 1675 with early 60s small GMT hand, etc... Cheers
  2. 1575 is only for references 1675 & 1655, not for reference 1500 (or any other reference). 1575 is the GMT version of 1570. 1565 is also the GMT version of 1560. 1565 is suitable only for ref. 1675 and was being phased out by early 1964 (replaced by, u guessed it, a faster BPH 1575).
  3. Yup, a classic rare Breitling/Wakmann/Gigandet AOPA members only "Datora" watch from the mid-50s/early 60s. Nanuq's watch is the ultra-version with the killer super-function movement. What a treat to see. The best part is that it was originally released into the wild only through AOPA membership, so I bet this watch has logged in some flightime for sure.
  4. Woa, those are some intense pics. Nice choice of watch for the mission - very fitting.
  5. Gorgeous! :wub: I am going crazy lookin' at all these vintage Breitlings. I can't stop thinking about that possible 806 that I'm trying to purchase. I think I will go for a long walk on a short pier.
  6. I'll have to agree that the TT bracelet is very nice looking. Whilst I still prefer leather, the TT bracelet does look incredible.
  7. Could it be a 2007 release? I did find this pic:
  8. Happy happy Birthday to you my Alaskan buddy! Best regards!!!!!! PS. Dear Submariner reps, watch out, you might get lit today!
  9. I am wondering if the PAM 210 with PVD exists as an OEM model. If it does, is the caseback solid or see-thru? It suddenly occured to me that I think I really like the look of this rep. I've tried in vain to find out any info regarding OEM - now I turn to you folks. Cheers
  10. Once again, I got frustrated with what I had donned in the AM. Something was missing, or at least, has been missing. It took me a while to figure out what it was. Suddenly, it occured to me that the 3717 was what was missing in my daily life. I had purposely put it away into a drawer so that I would not be tempted to wear it. I wanted to give some of my other watches a chance to be used. Anyhow, this watch is geat! And I missed it!
  11. Excellent choice(s)! Especially if your buddy plans on doing some offshore diving (not onshore R&R diving).
  12. Thank you for posting the pic. I look forward to the mod.
  13. Fascinating historical item(s). It will be interesting to see where the gavel falls.
  14. I've got the earliest type thin Rolex Jubilee from the early 60s that I've strapped to my 60s 5513. It is terrible, the Jubilee is only made for the thinner profile GMT. Here's a pic of the Jubillee. You will notice how nice and thin it is. Anyhow, it is the 1st generation Jubilee which remains very hard to come by in this day & age. It is perfectly made for 1675!
  15. I put away my 1675 and slapped on another GMT - a very very accurate one at that.
  16. At this point in time, the 3717 is the way to go. JMHO.
  17. I really think that there should be a crappy rep Library.
  18. MMmm, Simon and is watch. Any watch he wears is better than the owner! Cheers
  19. Damn, that is great of you to post your album, great pics! It's a treat! Cheers
  20. You are a brave man for swimming with rep. Glad it worked out for you.
  21. All of the original (ref. 806) Navitimers came with leather straps. Some of the straps were lizard, others were calf. The original TT Navitimers looked very sharp with their respective leather attached to 'em. If u ask me, a TT Navitimer needs to be paired with leather - not a band! Cheers
  22. Just the other day... Nice lens, too.
×
×
  • Create New...
Please Sign In or Sign Up