I don't have a problem when somebody posts my pics... I do have a problem when somebody does without telling people where he got them from.
I do that too, so IMO it's not too much to ask.
@Lancelot: Thanks a LOT for your great tip....
Thought about that quite often.... I think I'll do so in the future.
This is actually the first time I found someone using my pics....
Thanks!
@Dluddy: Thanks for editing the post.
Yes, the watch in the pics is a gen - I had it for a few weeks and then traded it because the coating wore off on the edge of one of the lugs (probably from strap changing).
The Blacksteel is a DLC coated version of the standard Skyland with a different dial (obviously ). I also had this confirmed by Breitling.
Cheers,
bricky
PS: I'd like to have those pics removed..... thanks
Normally I wouldn't care at all.... but when someone uses MY pictures of MY watch without asking me for permission I tend to be a little [censored]. So if somebody would be so kind to remove them....
?!
@mil_sub: Could you elaborate why you post pictures of a watch without asking the owner for permission to do so or at least state where you stole them?
Sure.... could it be that all of your knowledge comes from internet boards?
Of course there might be one or another salesperson that actually knows something about watches.... but most of them definitely don't.
Maybe you should try to get out a bit more......
I don't get it.... why do you guys assume that somebody has knowledge about watches just because he's an AD? They sell watches to make a living, most of them know [censored]-all about what they sell.
The chance that an employee of an AD recognizes a fake as a fake is extremely low, unless it's one of those 10$ quartz beaters......