faonmyea

sorry for the ignorance. is that 1.25mm into the case or 1.25mm diameter?

if not, what size would i have to drill them to accept gen springbars?

i like that strap

can someone catch me up to speed? have the logo feet been fixed yet? it seems like such an easy fix. that would bother me. what are the flaws of the UPO?

innnnnnn

take a joke

you guys just love blowing thing up. i was under the impression that a subscription was $5 a month for a year, so $60. i didn't know you could just subscribe for a month. SORRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRY.

chill out

confused

heck yeah $5 is tight for me. every cent counts.

i just want to get rid of these reps i have that are too bling. maybe someone can sell them for me who has a subscription?

i had this idea where when you get tired of a rep, you can trade with someone for a couple weeks, or forever. maybe if your rep is worth a lot you can trade it for 2. just pay for shipping. it would probably be impossible to organize, but i think it's a neat idea none the less.

isn't cosc +-5secs a day? i say wait a week or so and get a feel for how much time it loses, then adjust it yourself.

how hard is it to resize the bracelet yourself? if i get another rep this would be it. i can just get a tool right?

fix your bezel first

the pin that holds the lever in the 196 falls out and the lever on the 050 is ugly. can a gen guard work with these reps?

i have an extra set of crown bridges for a pam196. would this fit most 44mm pams?

The bent second hand puts the point closer to the marks on the dial removing paralax inaccuracy on the sub-second chrono.

just in case some of you don't know, this is when you look at the hand from different angles. so if the true second hand time was at 00 seconds, if you view it from the right it would look like 59 seconds. from the left would look like 1 second. bending reduces this error.

the IWC logo on the clasp looks rough. is it just the picture or is it really like that?

sometimes i think the date font. wouldn't it make sense to take at least one straight foward shot?

doubt it

it makes it somewhat difficult to tell the accuracy. it makes me think they're trying to hide the flaws.

i want one

isn't there a poll on this somewhere?

i know nothing about submariners, but just look around. i'm sure there are millions of posts already dedicated to this.

the 196 daylight was the first pam i got. i'm more of a 50, 51 kind of guy though. simple. maybe that's the lure. it's simple.