Jump to content
When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission.

elprimerozen

Member
  • Posts

    1,237
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by elprimerozen

  1. At a first glance: The colour of the ceramic insert looks really strange, so does the pearl.

    I think its ok...or i can say its the corect "effect" for a full ceramic bezel!I was "playing" the other day with a friends Gen GMT ceramic and in the most position the bezel made the same 'gray" effect!!

  2. i saw it, It seems nice. I have already bought the 2nd version . do you think i can order only the Ceramic Bezel ring to exchange on my Deep Sea ???

    I realy dont know....the only thing that i need to see upclose is the 2piece case back... and i will put it to the presure test so we can finaly end this "waterproof or not" story!

  3. I just saw the last 1:1 deepsea at Joshuas site.....finaly the all been waiting for detail: WATER PROOF TESTED!! but only 3atm....this freaking titanium/steel case back gave a "hard time to make" to the boys from china!....

    I will have it in about 1 week...and a lot of detail pics will folow.....about 80 :rolleyes:

  4. These deepsea or deepshit seadweller are no good by me....wait...

    As i see none and i say NONE says WATER RESITANT for this watch.....and im pretty sure that with this crapy case back with titanium pressed with steel it will not be water resistant....as i see its the only watch that joshua dont say water resistant....think about that :huh:

    Be carefull..... i hope somebody will test this watch in a sofisticated machine for presure test!

  5. Please explain how I can tell if it's a Sub case instead of the proper SD. I haven't got a good eye for this sort of thing.

    Is it the shape of the lugs?

    To give you a litle help...always remeber that the old Seadweller replica used a Submariner case,this is wrong in dimensions

    The new SSD uses a new the so called "1:1" copy..and its corect in dimensions

    :secret: So:

    SSD:thicker case

    Old seadweller: thiner case(like submariner) wrong!

    SSD:Smaller diameter of crystal

    Old Seadweller:Big diameter of crystal(like sub) wrong!

    SSD:smaller diameter of bezel

    Old seadweller: biger diameter(like sub) wrong!

    SSD: Fat crown tube like genuine seadweller

    Old seadweller: thin tube and crown...like the old Rolex reps....wrong again

    SSD: fat bezel ring!

    Old seadweller: thin bezel ring

    SSD: fat nice crystal...

    Old seadweller: thin crystal...

    ...and it goes on and on and on....

    Check the dimensions of this SSD: http://www.jpc8118.com/rlsd10003-super-dwe...362-p-3585.html

    And the old seadweller with submariner case: http://www.jpc8118.com/rlsd10001-black-dia...ted-p-2079.html

  6. Um, huh?

    1 - WM9 claims its a gen ETA movement.

    2 - Someone points out that there is a crappy copy of that ETA in ladies reps.

    3 - you decide that WM9 is using the crappy copies?

    Re-read the thread. WM9 is using ETA parts, according to experts.

    Well said!! I only talk about that there is a copy of the "small size" eta movement! WM9 uses gen eta movement!! Dont take it the wrong way :p ..... All i said was only for information that the copy eta exists also in ladys size!

  7. So the plot thickens... How long ago did you get the clone 3135?

    This movement its NOT mine! I have seen these pics on the web....and there was a discusion about this incident.its been almost a year now(the pics)...and i have tryed ever since to surce this kind of copy movement...but with no luck.... B)

  8. Here is a photo comparison of a gen and rep movement.

    These watch was send to Rolex for a service..and thing gone all wrong....they realized that they were looking at a SUPERB 3135 copy...and so they destroyed the movement by bending it!!

    Enjoy these litle pics as these are the only ones that i have personaly looked on the web!

    First Gen then rep:

    1210329285G.jpg

    1210329241R1.jpg

    Look what they have done to this "king" of rep movement!!

    1210327347R2.jpg

    1210327230R2.jpg

  9. He he.... i have at the moment a COPY eta 2678-2 in my hands....and i have it for almost a year, at my watch box with useless crap spare parts.

    Its a very very bad copy movement.

    I will post pics later... he he..

    This movement came with a ladys datejust...and it was the worst movement ever!!

    ps:there will always be copy eta...as there are original Rolex 3135 movement copy exactly the same....i can post also pics from the copy 3135.

×
×
  • Create New...
Please Sign In or Sign Up