So, latest status on the LM?
Alot of issues are very different on this model, for the new people to this thread:
Main differences:
Dial is glossy/polished, not matt.
It has the older PO version of the crown and HE crown, not the new one with flat threads, instead of triangular/pointy.
It does have the same bezel as the new PO's.
Closed CB, which eliminates problems arising about the movement not looking up to scratch.
The dial is very interesting for me, as I have worked alot with Omega.
It has the same font for indexes as the old planet oceans (Before the Co-Axial inhouse movements, so about 3+ years old.), but made in the same way as the new ones. (Metal indexes, instead of having the index markings and numerals painted on the dial.
The PO LM:
Not the details of it specified above.
And here is the NEW PO. (Gen)
Again, note the differences to the above, specially the difference of the "9 and "6, outer grip shape of the crown(s), polished bezel and dial as opposed to brushed/matt.
And last but not least, the older version of the PO.
Note the differences between both the newer PO, and the LM.
The outer grip of the bezel is different, not straight as the two previous pictures, the crowns are the same as on the LM, but not the newer PO.
Dial and bezel insert are slightly different on this one, and the pearl seems a little different to me, but i'm not sure about that.
The bracelet is also rather different, it's slimmer on the new versions.
It seems that the new LM is a slight mix between the new and the old PO, with a few tweaks, such as the new bracelet design. (Although this particular watch on the image is one of the rare PO's made with the Divers mesh link.)
The only one of these that has the display CB (On the gen.) is the NEWER PO, whereas the LM and the older version have the classic Seahorse logo, thus making these (reps) in one way more gen like, since they don't show the obvious flaws of the incorrect movement.
Hope this clarifies a little more as to the differences between these three beauties!
CS Out!