Stephane

Wow, what a thread...

I'm not jocking Trib I'm really looking for a gen 78790 Anyone ? Well, of course without the diver extension.

Rosnik, if you want to sell your genuine 78790 I have a nice GMT Master II that could use it

Sorry but did you ever consider Narika & TTK's "NoobMariner" ? If not, pls do so before you buy whatever "cheap" Sub. Cheers Stephane

Hi Bt, One more great review and fantastic pics ! Thanks for the time and energy spent here once again. You made me wand to wear mine right away Cheers Stephane

Adjectives ? Well that is the less I'm looking at...too much trendy posts here about super reps and few super reps. No, it's just that I would prefer to go for a "almost fully modded one" and send it to K2222 like my 3717...

Congratulation for your first baby K Well done. My best wishes to you and the mum Stephane

Thanks guys. Apparently, this is a very good deal and nice watch but not as good as the old ones.. Cheers Stephane

Hi Guys, There is a good deal on that Pam and I would like to have experts opinions on this watch. I don't matter about the bracelet/strap but more of the case/dial of course Daylight pam 250 ( leather band version only ) 229 usd Black http://gangan.moo.jp/hon/daylight-ku-28800.jpg Many thanks in advance, Cheers Stephane

@ All Thank you so much for your kind words. Indeed my Nautilus was not worn more than the time needed to take a wrist shot photo. @Castellano: when you'll get a new watch, do me a favour. Take a loupe and inspect it. You will see that the watch cannot be without any "hairlines" Once you have been spending an entire day wearing your new watch, look at it again under a loupe. You might see one or two serious scratches. That's life.

Indeed

Very nice topic Omega. This how the comparison shots should be presented. Helps a lot to make an opinion. Cheers Stephane

Tuesday I wear this. Old shot, in the meantime it has been AR coated by k2222. No need to say that I can't see the crystal anymore!

It's cold out here :laugh: Congrats Admin, very nice. Let's be positive, it's Christmas !!! Yippee

Oh OK...so you have a 1996 gen and the bracelet is a 78790 where I have a 2000 (lug holed too) and the baracelet is a 93160 ... Damn, all these references and mixed Rolies

Today I should alternate these two ones: LugHoles 16600 Fortis (From Nanuq)

Wow, that is interresting. I can't wait to see the SSD in the flesh. Shoud arrive tomorrow here. When I removed the bracelet from the genuine, I was very surprised by the quality of the gen end links versus all other rep Rolex bracelets that I have here. The springbar holes are widder in my opinion. What year is your Gen Rosnik? Cheers Stephane

Well, I would prefer the non wg surounded indices but even the 1st one is looking great. Both versions are looking great. I couldn't choose, sorry to add to your own undecision...

Splendid work Tribal. So, now you are not the Submariner man only ...you are the Sea Dweller guru too

@Raymond: wow, great choice

Thanks Freddy. Here another one for you with the lug holes

Thanks guys for your nice comments and great input. Cheers Stephane (wow, that is an old thread)

@TMG: cool, as the 1655 is not worn right now, I would sacrifice myself to help it to get some wrist time

Thanks BT. You have very good eyes

I couldn't find a new topic for this week end so I might aswell start it... Here is a SeaDweller. I think I won't change it from the week-end