Jump to content
When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission.

Montecarlo801

Member
  • Posts

    32
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Montecarlo801

  1. It’s been a while so I’m not up on who or what factory is kicking out decent GMTs but I found this locally and I wanted your thoughts. I know the pics are not the best but this is what I got. Thanks!IMG_8806.PNG

     

     

    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

    IMG_8807.JPGIMG_8810.JPG


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  2. Your question is unclear mate... Same thing as what? A ZF dayto is a ZF dayto. Or do you mean are JF and ZF versions the same? I must say it's unclear to me too. I played with a ZF made 23J and I believe it is a great base to get right a 2003 116520. You need to mod the case and the movement. Crown height differs, but overall quality is excellent.

     


    I was referring to the model and build quality. I am impressed with what I have seen on the JF with the gen like case depth and the dial is surprisingly good too. I know there are multiple factories but I didn't know if these are essentially the same.
  3. That is not only a rep but a terrible rep of the 16613...

    Insert, crown, crown guard, DWO font, dial font, cornet, SEL fitment, etc... You get the picture... Bad rep.

    So right. there was a place in my area that converted gen ss subs to two tones with bad aftermarket dials, bands, etc. I was hoping that the case was gen do bad I ignoring the obvious. Thanks everyone.

  4. Im no expert but the dial looks horrible and the date font looks wrong too. Then the bracelet doenst look right either. The font on the insert look too fat for me.

    lets see what the others say. But for me its a fake and I dont see gen parts on it. But let the real experts cime in

    I agree, man. I wanted it to be real to the point I started convincing myself there was a possibility. Too good of a deal usually means just that.

×
×
  • Create New...
Please Sign In or Sign Up