Jump to content
When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission.

The Mentalist

Member
  • Posts

    466
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by The Mentalist

  1. This is the famous ETA Noobmariner, a watch that some still don't acknowledge the existence of. I have this very same watch from Andrew and it's fantastic and the best out of the box Sub rep in existence. In person, the pearl does not look anywhere near as zitty as it does in some of the pics and is comparatively quite good compared to others I've seen. Wear it well.

  2. breitling made a watch capible of 10000ft and made it look a breitling, and look good at the same time. rolex designers seem to have gotten lost in their concept. their end product is just not balanced.

    Don't be ridiculous. The new watches are unmistakeably Rolex. They are still recognisably the Seadweller and Submariner respectively. They've updated the design and not altogether drastically either. There will always be those that prefer the older design, that's ok. I don't care much for the lamborghini Murcielago but I loved it's predecessor, the Diablo. But it doesn't mean I can't appreciate the newer model. Just don't dismiss something new as being bad just because it's not how you would have done it.

  3. Actually, after looking at it some more, the new SD is a terrific watch. Its design aesthetic is certainly more pointedly rugged than past iterations and the functionality is more obviously emphasised. However, I'm really starting to like it. Rather a lot. I really like the flatter crystal and the extra deep, stepped rehaut. I've always found Rolex's to be a bit girly in size compared to the Omegas and this certainly goes a long way to redressing the balance. If I could, I would buy this watch in a heartbeat.

  4. I happen to like the new Submariner. There is a certain design purity that is undeniably Rolex. I wonder how much of this negative reaction is merely group mentality? A year from now, I bet many of the initial naysayers will be wanting one of these new Subs or SD's. Change is good. It's not exactly as if the old Submariners will be disappearing from the face of the planet so why can't these new models be accepted?

    PS. I do think the new SD is fugly as hell.

  5. Yes. They are all quartz.

    Regards.

    Making it a quartz is like cheating. You could pretty much do anything with electronics and a battery. If those complications were mechanical, we're in Patek territory. That's why Patek are Patek and Citizen are, well....Citizen. :huh:

  6. Jay is it big? Way the hell is he wearing it above his cuff in the movie?

    It's a Gianni Agnelli affectation that some fashionistas have adopted because they think it's 'cool'. Little do they know that the only reason why Agnelli does it is because of a nickel allergy.

    Interno 8 have even gone as far as creating a special shirt with a double cuff that features a cutout for the watch.

  7. Ok, I had a very profound experience earlier today. I saw owdeguy's Breitling Chronomat Vitesse and I fell totally head over heels in love with this watch:

    watch002.jpg

    (I hope he doesn't mind me reposting his pic as it really is a corking shot)

    The reason this is so profound is that I almost never find a watch a 'must-have'. Not the PO, the SMP or the Rolex Submariner. And certainly not a Breitling. I have never been into Breitlings in any big way. They are nice watches but they don't capture my imagination in the way that Omega has. The only gen's I've ever owned and still own have been Omegas but no watch has had me jonesing for one quite like this Breitling.

    I can't understand why they have never repped this watch considering it's not unimpressive aesthetic strengths.

    Anyway, I'm off to an AD tomorrow to get me one of these babies. God help me.

  8. This is because the dial of the rep is recessed further from the lip of the bezel (the gen dial is closer to the glass) which means it looks bigger to the eye...

    Basically you're saying that the Gen Speedy has a shallower rehaut?

    Oh boy, you've opened up a can of worms here. Before you know it, there will be fur and claws flying whilst we argue about a 0.01mm difference in rehaut depth just like with the Subs.

  9. I'm glad you bring that up. I've had many (as you can imagine) messages on that same subject, so let me answer it publicly here and now.

    Yes, I'm a Panerai collector and have shared many great times with "Team Panerai" and the Panerai collectors community....but I don't work for them. I go where the good atmosphere is and where I can have some fun while maybe contributing a little as well. I don't feel (as others do) that Gen collectors aren't REAL collectors because the watches they collect aren't real. That's BULL! Community starts in the heart .... not the pocket.

    I have been enriched by my association with all the great folks at Panerai, Paneristi, TimeZone, and ViaPaneristi and still have great respect for them all. So, I'm here (after lurking for a while) because of your community here and I can only hope to put back some of what I get here ..... besides, you guys are AWSOME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Thanks for clearing that up. The reason I asked is that your association with us Rep collectors might not endear you to the guys at Panerai if they were to ever find out, even though you are 'incognito' the fact that your name is engraved on these amazing pieces might make you readily identifiable.

  10. Well, the PAM0195 was something I started with Angelo Bonati. The PAM0206 was offered to me by Philippe Bonay (ex Prez of Panerai US) when they did the special run for the WS Champ Marlin's

    And you're on a replica forum?! I don't get it.

    (Sorry, I wasn't meaning to be rude as I have no idea who you are, but if you're 'in' with the top guys at Panerai surely frequenting a replica forum is a bit of a conflict of interest?)

×
×
  • Create New...
Please Sign In or Sign Up