Search the Community

Right guys!! Here we go. I'm fairly short on time but here is the answer you have beenwaiting for. Dial is very nice with good superlume glow and also on the pearl which is not that bad and does have a nice pearly finish to it. Datefont is correct with nicely spaced 11, 21 and 31. Bracelet is poor!! Horrible shaped end links and very flimsy! The crown is slightly too thick and the CG's slightly too short but not as bad in the flesh as the QC pics suggest. The Bezel is pretty well done with a nicely polished edge. Maybe the teeth good be a bit deeper but a massive issue in the flesh. Lug shape is slightly wrong and looks worse in pics than reality. They need squaring off a bit as they taper down to the end. Caseback is fine with nice engraving. The movement is the superclone ETA marked in this case 2834-2 with crappy Rolex markings but seems to be running smoothly enough. Time will tell on that score. Am I annoying you yet!!!!! Get to the main area of concern you say!!!! Well....................................................................................... .........................................................Ok guys, the REHAUT ISSUE!!! The crystal is crap in one word!! It is certainly making the rehaut look incorrect in some of dealer QC pics although this is a much improved version of course!! Ok here we go. YES!!! the rehaut is better and is a separate piece as on a genuine SD16600. The crystal sits on top of the detachable rehaut inside a thin gasket. The crystal has asmooth edge and no ridge as on a Sub crystal. I have a gen crystal arriving this week but I doubt I can fit it but we will see soon enough! I have to go to work now but here are some pics to explain better.