zbig Posted September 13, 2006 Report Share Posted September 13, 2006 (edited) If You want to have better hands for Your avenger chrono, maybe this can help please take a look genuine I ver. with good pearl (genuine dial) have minute hands shorter than genuine, second hand have shorter back II ver. with bad pearl have good second hand but longer minute hand than genuine. And this ver. have better dial, bigger date window Edited September 13, 2006 by szumi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ek300is Posted September 14, 2006 Report Share Posted September 14, 2006 Just received my bad pearl version yesterday with the date window not lining up well. But this shot was taken 10pm while the date wheel already started to turn creating such effect. W. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
relaxman Posted September 14, 2006 Report Share Posted September 14, 2006 My new genuine for your veiwing pleasure. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chrgod Posted September 14, 2006 Report Share Posted September 14, 2006 My Chrono Avenger ( I ver.) is on its way from Trusty right now... I thought that I should snap one up, before it is too late... As you know, production of the Titanium version is stopped. Another fault with the second version is that the '4' in '45' on the bezel is incorrect. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fourcam Posted November 30, 2007 Report Share Posted November 30, 2007 Hi all, I own the 2nd titanium version of the Avenger Chrono with the bad/ridiculous pearl too. Does anybody know where to get a gen looking replacement pearl or even complete bezel? Your help is appreciated. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Watchmeister Posted November 30, 2007 Report Share Posted November 30, 2007 Here is my first generation rep with gen dial. I reset mine to the same time as what is on the genuine pics and those hand sizes look very close (at least in terms of length on main hour and minute hands as well as the chrono seconds hand. What am I missing? Does it have more to do with the rep dial and its marker and sub-dial placement? Although as I look at it I have to remember that the watches are shot at an angle and so it may be deceiving. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cskent69 Posted November 30, 2007 Report Share Posted November 30, 2007 Here is mine with gen dial. How do these hands look (they are from Gen1 watch) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Watchmeister Posted November 30, 2007 Report Share Posted November 30, 2007 Same question which is why I am wondering if it is more of a function of the dial than the hands. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.