Panerai's with date but no magnifier? (PAM386 for example.)

[CokeSmurf]

Hey guys!
I'm falling more and more in love with Pams, but i have a few inquiries before i actually get one!
One think i simply hate with Panerai's that have a calender is the magnifier on the crystal.
So models like the 386 are kind of more in my taste!

Now, to the main questions i need answered:
How good is the movement?
How accurate is the watch in general to the gen?
Where can i find (preferably a gen) deployant clasp that is the same colour as the watch?

Lastly, your personal opinions of this watch; is it a "good", "great", "super", or "bad" rep?

Link from Trusty!
http://www.ttw888.com/index.php?main_page=product_info&cPath=37_51&products_id=10937

Thanks!

/CS

[StormTooper4]

Good to great depending on you ability to accept it not being actual ceramic

[CokeSmurf]

What material are they made of, some kind of composite similarity to ceramic?

[StormTooper4]

Nah the 292 ( and some Chanels and Hublots) is the only true ceramic rep AFAIK.

Its steel that's DLC'd or PVD coated. There have been incidents of the gens cracking and chipping so the rep should last longer.

[CokeSmurf]

Which of these two would you yourself recommend; The 386 or the 359, both from Andrew/Trusty
 

[StormTooper4]

Which of these two would you yourself recommend; The 386 or the 359, both from Andrew/Trusty

 

 

Dude why you care what I think , I aint gonna be wearing it,  you are , What do you Like thats what matters

 

I have a couple PVD watches so dont need one , if you dont have one then I suggest the 386 

 

I have a 312

Bloody wonderful watch even if its a V1, but its a brushed case and the 359 polished case is really nice.....  But I dont like all the numbers on the 359's dial , way to fussy for my liking but thats me and this watch is about your likes not mine.  

 

Blimey this place is full of old women these days , Man up Mate and just get one will you and then post it up, come on you can do it