P'cisT Posted January 18, 2014 Report Share Posted January 18, 2014 Just received these latest QC photos and thought you guys might be curious too. What do you think? Is it me or is the 40 and 50 on the dial too close to the edge? And is the Rolex logo on the clasp uneven? DW? Hope you guys enjoy the photos. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sputim Posted January 18, 2014 Report Share Posted January 18, 2014 I guess the problem is that the insert is glued down to deep. Rolex logo on clasp is not perfectly aligned but you must be lucky to get one 100% perfect Except of the insert the watch looks totally fine. Ask the dealer. Certainly not a big deal and in worst case the insert can be replaced Nice watch, enjoy it when you receive it! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ProMariner Posted January 18, 2014 Report Share Posted January 18, 2014 BP sub are great and excellent pieces for the price but they always f*** up with their insert, engraved and depth numerals markers is great but not very well centered and aligned, try to ask another insert, because I think you will need to buy another one if you can not live with it ! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
indywatchguy Posted January 18, 2014 Report Share Posted January 18, 2014 Get a BK sub-C...it's worth the extra cash! He goes the distance to fix the BP fac screw ups and lack of QC. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MisterStefan Posted January 19, 2014 Report Share Posted January 19, 2014 Is this v3? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
live1 Posted January 20, 2014 Report Share Posted January 20, 2014 no its a bp sub c Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ceejay Posted January 20, 2014 Report Share Posted January 20, 2014 Is that really the best off the shelf Sub C there is (excluding BK)? Pearl looks off to the right slightly?, date looks low in the window, they still have not fixed the no gap between the Officially Certified, the gaps between the Oyster Perpetual Date are massive. It should be a high beat 28,000 movement too? Shame as it's such a lovely watch. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sputim Posted January 21, 2014 Report Share Posted January 21, 2014 Is that really the best off the shelf Sub C there is (excluding BK)?Pearl looks off to the right slightly?, date looks low in the window, they still have not fixed the no gap between the Officially Certified, the gaps between the Oyster Perpetual Date are massive.It should be a high beat 28,000 movement too?Shame as it's such a lovely watch.Bp sub c along with noob v2 are the best otb (exluding BK's) at the moment. V2 has the correct gap between oyster perpetual and a very nice pearl but the engraving on the insert and the sel ia not perfect. Bp has a bad clasp, not best pearl but a nice and deeply engraved insert and an incredible SEL fittment Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.