replica zone's planet ocean

[ahchard]

any comments? not enough pictures to really tell, but looks ok... caseback seems a bit off... not sure about the clasp... dial looks ok... hands look like a nice length...

experts comments???

[eLiNK]

The Omega logo on the dial looks more like on the Joshua's version.

[r11co]

Caseback logo is stuck on insert rather than cast. Band is flat, not curved. Bezel/dial orange looks too dark (could just be the photograph).

This looks like a generation 2 model that all the others were selling at one point or anohter.

[eLiNK]

Here are the pictures of the real thing (42 mm).

Enjoy.

Edited April 9, 2006 by eLiNK

[eLiNK]

Two more pictures of the genuine watches.

can you tell which one is 45 mm of size? (Don't cheat.)

[r11co]

Too easy!! The second one is the 45mm. Date window is set further from the edge of the dial (for obvious reasons).

[ahchard]

easier to spot is the gap between the omega logo and the wording...

[eLiNK]

It IS obvious that the date window should be set further from the edge.

I was just kind a surprised that the distance b/w the omega logo and the word OMEGA, which is not movement dependent, would differ as well.

[r11co]

Another giveaway is the scalloping on the bezel. I bet this is the feature they will get wrong on the 45mm reps....

[Chronus]

Helium valve placements on those genuine watches are definitely not in line with the 10 o'clock marker...

[eLiNK]

How comes no one is dusciussing pros and cons of the king's version?

I thought her watch is new, ist it not?