ahchard Posted April 9, 2006 Report Share Posted April 9, 2006 any comments? not enough pictures to really tell, but looks ok... caseback seems a bit off... not sure about the clasp... dial looks ok... hands look like a nice length... experts comments??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eLiNK Posted April 9, 2006 Report Share Posted April 9, 2006 The Omega logo on the dial looks more like on the Joshua's version. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
r11co Posted April 9, 2006 Report Share Posted April 9, 2006 Caseback logo is stuck on insert rather than cast. Band is flat, not curved. Bezel/dial orange looks too dark (could just be the photograph). This looks like a generation 2 model that all the others were selling at one point or anohter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eLiNK Posted April 9, 2006 Report Share Posted April 9, 2006 (edited) Here are the pictures of the real thing (42 mm). Enjoy. Edited April 9, 2006 by eLiNK Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eLiNK Posted April 9, 2006 Report Share Posted April 9, 2006 Two more pictures of the genuine watches. can you tell which one is 45 mm of size? (Don't cheat.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
r11co Posted April 9, 2006 Report Share Posted April 9, 2006 Too easy!! The second one is the 45mm. Date window is set further from the edge of the dial (for obvious reasons). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ahchard Posted April 9, 2006 Author Report Share Posted April 9, 2006 easier to spot is the gap between the omega logo and the wording... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eLiNK Posted April 9, 2006 Report Share Posted April 9, 2006 It IS obvious that the date window should be set further from the edge. I was just kind a surprised that the distance b/w the omega logo and the word OMEGA, which is not movement dependent, would differ as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
r11co Posted April 9, 2006 Report Share Posted April 9, 2006 Another giveaway is the scalloping on the bezel. I bet this is the feature they will get wrong on the 45mm reps.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chronus Posted April 9, 2006 Report Share Posted April 9, 2006 Helium valve placements on those genuine watches are definitely not in line with the 10 o'clock marker... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eLiNK Posted April 9, 2006 Report Share Posted April 9, 2006 How comes no one is dusciussing pros and cons of the king's version? I thought her watch is new, ist it not? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now