panerailord Posted July 11, 2006 Report Share Posted July 11, 2006 i see that the case of pan 250 have a big flaw the genuine have TACHYMETER and the replica write TACHYMETRE please joshua make the case right Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eLiNK Posted July 11, 2006 Report Share Posted July 11, 2006 I second that. The funny thing is that the word is spelled differently on different PAMs. Thus, it's spelled TACHYMETRE on PAM 251 and PAM 196. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dadog13 Posted July 11, 2006 Report Share Posted July 11, 2006 maybe the gen has a flaw! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Watchmeister Posted July 11, 2006 Report Share Posted July 11, 2006 I am too lazy to look but I am fairly sure that until this year all chronos with that bezel, be it steel or precious metal had the "re" spelling. I hadn't even noticed that they changed the spelling on the 250 and 251. You don't suppose we can find a long loop on the implications of changing the spelling on one of the purist forums. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nebakanezzar Posted July 11, 2006 Report Share Posted July 11, 2006 LOL! kinda anal. its such a small thing. anyone who would know that the spelling was wrong, would know the watch was a rep long before he/she spoted the mis-spelling. you wouldnt be fooling anyone...but yourself of course... My biggest worry about that watch is, which case is used? 1st gen, 2nd gen? Joshua said there is a 3rd gen...is the 3rd as solidly built as the 1st? or same as the 2nd? or even worse than the 2nd.... heh...I have a headach now.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now