Jump to content
When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission.

Agrippa

Member
  • Posts

    316
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Agrippa

  1. I'm thinking of getting a Royal Oak and I wonder if the older 38mm version is considered any good? I really don't want a display back, like the more recent models have and I can't stand the sight of the chronographs, so the 38mm seems like the only Royal Oak option. But is it a decent replica?

    Also, are the leather straps of the usual awful quality, or are they actually decent?

  2. Just a guess, but I've had the same thing happen to me a number of times (not with watches, but various other stuff) - I'm home all day, staying in because I'm expecting a delivery. No-one knocks on the door and no-one calls, but all the same the tracking data changes to "unsuccessful delivery attempt". The reason? The f*cking delivery guy (or girl) can't be bothered actually making the delivery, but just drives past and updates the tracking log to cover his/her ass.

    Don't know if that's what's happened in your case, but it's certainly a possibility.

  3. Not all bands, but that's ok I hope. Anyway, not an exhaustive list, but some favourites:

    Jehtro Tull (no intro needed I assume)

    Billie Holiday (ditto)

    Tom Waits (ditto)

    David Bowie (ditto)

    Claudio Monteverdi (Italian composer, gambist, and singer. 1567-1643)

    John Dowland (English composer, singer, and lutenist. 1563

  4. Horology today, or rather haute horologie, is no longer found in the line-ups offered by the big brands, but springs from small independent companies like Greubel-Forsey, Voutilainen, Speake-Marin, McGonigle and their like. That's primarily (though of course not exclusively) where innovation and real, old-fashioned craftsmanship exists these days.

    Obviously mechanised and computerised manufacturing processes actually ensure that the end products are of a more consistent quality than is the case if everything/most things are hand made, but what aficionados of real high-end watches presumably care about is the exclusivity of a timepiece made in its entirety by a skilled artisan. I certainly know that I wouldn't dream of handing over $20-50.000 for a watch unless I knew for sure it hadn't just "come out of a machine".

    Contrast the Hublot piece with this short snippet about Greubel-Forsey...

  5. Yes indeed, you probably are. I have a Swiss Fish and 4 Chronomats myself and I've no intention of stopping there. Both are incredibly nice watches, but for me the Chronomat is by far the more interesting one. The Fish is very simple, as behooves a quintessential tool watch, so one is really enough.

  6. Both are fabulous watches, so you really can't go wrong either way. The SOSF has better lume, although at times a bit sloppily applied, whereas the BCE is a classier and more classic piece. Both are reliable and very accurate if you get the right versions. Basically you just need to find out which one you like the most, or alternatively flip a coin.

    Personally though, I'd go with a BCE first.

  7. Thanks a lot man, that's an excellent answer - even for someone who's not a Pink Floyd fan. I just substituted Aqualung and got your drift right away. :) I guess I'll stay on the fence a while longer, while waiting for a thorough review, and hoping for an updated model from the factories (mainly because I don't like the look of the sharp-cornered bezel font).

×
×
  • Create New...
Please Sign In or Sign Up