Thanks for the tip. I contacted him about it, and his ring will solve about half my problems with this watch. But that brings me to another problem with this watch. Before I send it to JMB, I have to decide if I'm going to keep the PT crystal or get a Clark 127. Because the calender is farther to the left than the gen because of the ETA 2846 movement, installing a Clark 127 would mean the cyclops would be too far to the right, and I'm afraid it would look terrible. The date mag on my PT crystal is pretty good, so is there any real reason to put on a 127?
What movement does the MBW use? Is it low beat, is it ETA? Having a low beat ETA is great, I just wish the calender was a few more millimeters to the right.
The MBW and Josh's 1680 have the calender in the right spot (presumably) and it would line up with a 127 cyclops- but you couldn't use the low beat movement, could you?
After what I've learned from researching the flaws with the PT 1680 and Josh's 1680, I wish I had bought a MBW in the first place. If a good one popped up for somewhere around $500, I would probably get it. But if it gets too much higher than $500, it's not worth it for me. I have a genuine 1974 1680 red sub, but I can't afford to service it ($1,500 estimate), so if I start spending that much money on reps, I could just service the gen. I wouldn't want to wear the gen every day anyway. I like having a beater "stunt double" of my watch.