Jump to content
When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission.

GBOGH

Member
  • Posts

    970
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    6

Posts posted by GBOGH

  1. No, I didn't test the alloy on your watch, but I've handled several hundred PAM reps from both of the leading factories. It's not about the cost but about availability of this metal for sintering applications. Coincidentally, I've also done metal fab. work so I know how to make steel look brighter or duller with abrasives and lapping/satination compounds. I also happen to know a little bit about manufacturing, specifically in China so if you want to believe you're getting 316F, I won't dissuade you.

    No worries, you can dissuade me. :lol:

    All I know is that this watch has SS that is noticeably brighter/whiter than any of the other 50+ regular SS PAM reps I've owned before. Looks damn good and with the white dial really pops IMO. It's high quality metal alloy that has held up nearly 2 years and the metal still looks as bright and as good as when I first bought it.

    :D

  2. You can be sure that no 316 grade steel, especially no 316F was used in making of these or any other mass-produced Chinese rep. No matter what the description states, you're getting AISI304 or similar.

    Did you test the alloy on this production batch? :lol:

    It is noticeably brighter than any other regular brushed SS PAM rep I've seen. It has visual qualities to indicate a higher inclusion of nickel in the alloy. There were several threads about this a while back, but the net sum is that 316F is not an expensive SS alloy and no reason to indicate that another alloy was used by the factory that is similar in cost but something different than advertised. This model is from 2 years ago production, the A7753 quick date change model. Regarded as a super rep before the explosive run of HF and NF PAMs seen over the past yearly so. :)

×
×
  • Create New...
Please Sign In or Sign Up