Jump to content
When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission.

dbane883

Member
  • Posts

    2,813
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    104

Posts posted by dbane883

  1. There are 2 types of "case necks" on the 5513/5512.  Pre 1966-ish, the outside of the rehaut wall was straight...  Diameter was roughly 28.05-28.10mm.   

    After 1966, the outer rehaut was "stepped".  The top 1/2 portion of the rehaut was wider and was roughly 28.2mm as automatico has indicated.  The lower 1/2 was still 28.05-28.10mm.  I imagine Rolex made this change to improve water tightness.  The stepped design creates more "tension" on the inside wall of the crystal and the top 1/2 of the rehaut (in particular the lower corner lip of wider section) "bites" into the softer acrylic material of the plexi after the retaining ring is installed.

     

     

     

    • Like 2
  2. Best sub ever? That chapter ring gilt exclamation dial sure looks the part and paired with a fresh bevel pcg case... Thought about a skinny 4 insert?

    Skinny 4 is more period correct for a '63 build. Also, there is some controversy of the authenticity of skinny 4 inserts. I don't think there is any official Rolex pictures of that insert in any of their literature

    • Like 1
  3. Hi guys,

     

    I mentioned awhile back that I was embarking on a new project.  Well, its now ready for public criticism.

     

    I had my heart set on building a 3,6,9 PCG sub from the early '60's.  Having first acquired a cal 1530 with the appropriate butterfly rotor, I looked for an appropriate case.  Luckily (although $$ buys one a lot of luck), I found a genuine 1962 PCG case and decided that an explorer dial is the direction i wanted to go. The watch came complete, but had a more recent cal 1530 and a very bad aftermarket dial.

     

    Sadly, the mid case was poorly polished and the bevels were all but destroyed.  This is what it looked like when I received it.  Truly horrific:

    IMG_9503_zpsktzwicud.jpgIMG_9502_zpsrd5kh0ig.jpgIMG_9501_zpseap63lsp.jpg

     

    I can live with an unpolished case that has worn lugs, but I cannot live with a case that was recently polished poorly. As such, I proceeded to give the mid-case a complete make-over. While a NOS looking case may not be appropriate for a 1962 watch, it’s not uncommon to have the case-refreshed by professionals who know what they are doing.  If a case is going to be polished, I’d rather have one done properly that one done poorly.

     

    After several hours of surgery and taking steps to ensure the CG’s were minimally touched, here is the end result on the mid-case.  I think it’s much more acceptable now:

     

    IMG_0140_zpssijcnm4q.jpgIMG_0141_zpsvqsqvote.jpgIMG_0143_zpsvxwcquaj.jpg

     

    For the dial.  There was only one choice.  Obviously he cannot be mentioned, but I decided I wanted a 3,6,9 “silvery” gilt dial, exclamation.  There are several different varieties of 5512/5513 explorer dials, but I think the one I chose suits the build.

     

    IMG_0148_zpsu6s3xiij.jpg

     

    The hands are still a work in progress.  While genuine, I am still seeking a set of flat hands.  The hands I’m using now were a set I had lying around.  It’s doesn’t look terrible, but I think flat hands would really finish off the project nicely.

     

    Genuine cal 1530:

    IMG_0151_zpsxrmzwyar.jpg

     

    Caseback:

    IMG_0146_zpsisridovr.jpg

    Most 5513’s in the early ’60’s used 5512 stamped casebacks.  It came with the mid-case and despite the poor polishing, the case was in stellar condition.  Not corrosion whatsoever.

     

    Complete specs:

    Genuine ’62 5513 mid-case, caseback

    Gen cal 1530

    Gen Tropic 19 superdome

    gen 5513 hands

    custom redial

    gen 700 twin-lock crown and tube

    Gen bezel asembly

    gen Uber-font “Long-5” insert (the only “kissing 50” long 5 i have ever seen)

    Gen 7206 rivet bracelet with 80 endlinks

     

    Just waiting to find the right hands, but until then, here are the semi-finished project:

    IMG_0152_zpswjmxb1bc.jpgIMG_0153_zpsolswop9n.jpgIMG_0154_zpsso1ugwbv.jpgIMG_0155_zpsqxtfamby.jpgIMG_0156_zps6kxldir6.jpgIMG_0157_zpsgwspjhso.jpgIMG_0158_zpsmhkeiygb.jpg

    IMG_0159_zpsx10lrgbo.jpg

     

    Group shot:

    21268b64-69ff-4755-ad4b-0755092a6c00_zps

     

    On the wrist, the PCG 5513 feels great.  I think it’s the slender profile that makes it so comfortable.  It’s a little known fact, but the PCG cases were a tad thinner than regular CG 5513’s:

    474458b4-eaf0-4a5f-98fa-a77c24ecab78_zps

     

    I'm hoping to have a set of original flat hands soon, but until then, I will have to live with this as it is.  

     

     

     

    61d231c8d92471073b4e90a5f406c6a2.jpg

    • Like 7
  4. Yes. I've used both 1520's and 1530's and never noticed a difference in fitment.

    And yes, the 1520 fit fine in the HH case for me. But since only 10 or so were made, there may have been slight differences amongst them.

    IMO, the rehaut on the HH case is a tad thin. Which is why I ended up using a phong case for the final build.

×
×
  • Create New...
Please Sign In or Sign Up