i am a noob in watch and even i can tell just by comparing my watch and the pic on the gen website...
i just dont understand how the hell did they make such a mistake.... is that why silix can sell it so cheap?? super-rep with defects?
hey FxrAndy, i am glad u finally know what i meant LOL...
anyway i do find it a big issue cos that means anybody can easily spot it is a rep if u ever compare it with a gen... anyone can tell they are different...
what the hell man, thought i bought myself a super-rep, now....
i am quite disappointed about that even though the watch is great overall
yes it is, take a look at the gen pic on Breitlings website: -
http://www.rwg.cc/members/index.php?act=at...st&id=17187
Then take a look at the rep, u can see the difference when the second hand reaches "12"...
no they are not, take a look at the gen pic i got from breitlings website...
then take a look at ur rep from silix... one is higher up than the other one...
actually i am talking about the location of the red square with a white circle within, if u take a look at ur rep and the following gen pic, u can see that they are at different position?? one is higher up than the other ???
anyone got their SOSF from silix recently??
has anyone noticed that the the "second" hand of the SOSF seems to be longer than normal??
is it normal?? or does it mean that it can be easily spotted as a rep??
thanks