Boba77 Posted July 7, 2011 Report Share Posted July 7, 2011 Hey guys, This has popped up on PureTimes site recently. http://puretimewatch.com/product/rlx-2011-07-04-01/ Im no expert, but it looks less wokky than the majority of other dealers offerings. Any comments good or bad will be greatly appreciated. Cheers Boba Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boba77 Posted July 8, 2011 Author Report Share Posted July 8, 2011 No GMT love?... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
By-Tor Posted July 8, 2011 Report Share Posted July 8, 2011 It has a serious flaw... the date wheel / cyclops are positioned way too right on the dial/crystal. This is very typical issue with Chinese Rolexes. Other than that, it looks decent. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeffmtbr Posted July 8, 2011 Report Share Posted July 8, 2011 I have a Puretime Pepsi GMT. It looks like the same watch your link is showing. At first I didn't care for the thing, but now that I've been wearing it more I'm liking it. Problems are the cyclops like By-Tor mentioned, and on mine the rehuat is angled incorrectly, which you can't really notice in the picture. The bracelet is really cheap feeling, sharp edges, really thin clasp, kinda "tinny" feeling. It's ok, but I wouldn't buy it twice. Hey guys, This has popped up on PureTimes site recently. http://puretimewatch.com/product/rlx-2011-07-04-01/ Im no expert, but it looks less wokky than the majority of other dealers offerings. Any comments good or bad will be greatly appreciated. Cheers Boba Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest zeleni kukuruz Posted July 8, 2011 Report Share Posted July 8, 2011 As they say... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
danielv2000 Posted July 8, 2011 Report Share Posted July 8, 2011 I bought a Pepsi and a Coke and sold them the same day. Too many things wrong when you read By-Tor's review of the better models and the gen. I keep hearing talk of a 1675 1:1... Now that would be something. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.