Latest Pam 111 with vitage hands.

[slask111]

Hi,

I really dont like to post theese "does it look allright to you". But i just recieved my qc pics and im a bit unsure here. The watch looks great, with the vintage hands and all. But the cutout of the CG looks a bit off to me. It looks to big, you can se a bit of the leverpin in the cutout. What do you think? I think maybe new dial but old CG. Or new batch might have a CG like this?

Thnx and pls comment

[Scarface]

The cg is perfect no problems in it

Sent from my 

[Gasenga]

+1 CG looks great.

The cg is perfect no problems in it

Sent from my 

[bumroxas]

looks good even from the back...

[slask111]

Looks more and more that I have a severe case of anal itching ;-)

But I must say to my defense that the 112 noob I received last week has a tiny bit better cg. But that is perfect so..

Skickat från min GT-I9100 via Tapatalk 2

[slask111]

Btw this new batch seems to have the lever ball

Skickat från min GT-I9100 via Tapatalk 2

[turboawd]

can I ask which dealer this is from, and if is a noob or h-fac 111N?

Thanks

[slask111]

can I ask which dealer this is from, and if is a noob or h-fac 111N?

Thanks

This is a noob 111 from Trevor.

[projectologist]

Cut-out looks fine as well as the roller-bearing positioning. Here are some gen examples at approximately the same angle (just tipped forward a little in one)...

[slask111]

Cut-out looks fine as well as the roller-bearing positioning. Here are some gen examples at approximately the same angle (just tipped forward a little in one)...

Thnx for the info and taking the time to post this. I was fooled since the 112 i have had for the last two weeks has an slightly fatter cg. I think this new cg is actually an improvement.

cheers