cousin_hub Posted July 24, 2013 Report Share Posted July 24, 2013 Hi Rolex experts What do you think of this LV ? What are the flaws ? Thanks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
By-Tor Posted July 24, 2013 Report Share Posted July 24, 2013 Good? Depends what you compare it to. Compared to WM9 or TC it's very weak rep. If it's a cheap one (under $100) it's ok. Good: Nice dial Nice datemag (correctly positioned) Bad: Awful SELs Oversized crown Not-so-good crown guards Really weird looking crystal/rehaut combo I believe this is the old WM9 from Eddie Lee/River. It was good back in 2004 but times have changed. The best thing about it is the genuine Swiss ETA movement which it (most likely) has. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cousin_hub Posted July 24, 2013 Author Report Share Posted July 24, 2013 It's an old version sell by Sead for 159$ The movement is a clone 2836 Is it the same for you here ? http://imgur.com/a/2j9nn Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cousin_hub Posted July 26, 2013 Author Report Share Posted July 26, 2013 The rehaut wasn't engraved before 2008 http://www.newturfers.com/vb/showthread.php?t=8171 Mark 1: Oval 'O', 'R' in 'Oyster' aligned with gap between left and right feet of 'R' in 'Rolex', '5 Ticks', Flat 4 (2003 Issue Models ONLY), From Y966xxx 19 September 2003 To F068XXX November 2003 Mark 1: Oval 'O', 'R' in 'Oyster' aligned with gap between left and right feet of 'R' in 'Rolex', '5 Ticks', Flat 4 (2004 Onwards) From F100000/F110000??? F Serial Late October 2004 To ??????? Mark 2: Oval 'O', 'R' in 'Oyster' aligned with gap between left and right feet of 'R' in 'Rolex', '5 Ticks', Pointed 4, From ??????? To F78XXXX 23 February 2005/F730XXX April 2005/F8XXXXX Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.