Someday Posted November 30, 2013 Report Share Posted November 30, 2013 Just recieved some QC pics of a 177 from the noob factory and I'm still new to the Pam game. Looking for opinions on how this watch looks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kazin326 Posted November 30, 2013 Report Share Posted November 30, 2013 I'm debating a 177 myself soon. I am not too sure of the tells on this model tho. I'm normally an Omega guy. But it looks nice! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ceejay Posted November 30, 2013 Report Share Posted November 30, 2013 Looks good to me. I have seen a updated movement offered somewhere that sorts out the incabloc Y issue and the engraved Panerai in the top bridge. But those faults are on the back of the watch Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Someday Posted November 30, 2013 Author Report Share Posted November 30, 2013 Looks good to me. I have seen a updated movement offered somewhere that sorts out the incabloc Y issue and the engraved Panerai in the top bridge. But those faults are on the back of the watch I believe that was a $170 option to add to this watch when I purchased it. Once that movement becomes more readily available I'll most likely pick one up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PeteM Posted November 30, 2013 Report Share Posted November 30, 2013 Thats the special edition rep 177 from the noob mate... you have a very special example there... You dont see any in the wild with a TRL like that... As for the movement I agree you shouldnt worry yourself.... assuming you take it off to show some one anyone that knows or understands a detail like the incabloc will know the other tells anyway so it certainly aint worth the money to do it at this time... Congrats mate and I hope its on your wrist soon Now you need to choose some shoes to go on it ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
indywatchguy Posted November 30, 2013 Report Share Posted November 30, 2013 Looks great! Rarely do I see a basic PAM rejected on QC. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now