shultz Posted February 17, 2007 Report Share Posted February 17, 2007 Hi there, I read something about differences in A and B series of these old GMT PAMs. E.g. the T or L printing which is both correct on B series. But what' about an ar coating? Is the genuine PAM 029 with tux dial ar coated? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rsv123 Posted February 17, 2007 Report Share Posted February 17, 2007 Hi Frank, it was always my belief that there was no AR coating on the gen PAM029. I will wait to be corrected...! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
V Posted February 17, 2007 Report Share Posted February 17, 2007 Hi Frank, it was always my belief that there was no AR coating on the gen PAM029. I will wait to be corrected...! No AR coating on A,B,C series Pams... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lovepanerai Posted February 17, 2007 Report Share Posted February 17, 2007 No AR coating on A,B,C series Pams... Panerai was very inconsistent back than and there are some models that had AR coating - not the 29 though AFAIK Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shultz Posted February 17, 2007 Author Report Share Posted February 17, 2007 Thanks for enlightening me folks. Otherwise I would have my crystal removed for an ar coating.... So a simple cyclops swap will be enough. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wadan Posted February 18, 2007 Report Share Posted February 18, 2007 Thanks for enlightening me folks. Otherwise I would have my crystal removed for an ar coating.... So a simple cyclops swap will be enough. Actually “ and please every body correct me if I am wrong “ the Date cyclops on the earlier models is different as well ,, they were smaller than the ones the current pams have . I think the rep Date cyclops are in fact closer to the earlier Pams cheers Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eddhead Posted February 19, 2007 Report Share Posted February 19, 2007 Actually " and please every body correct me if I am wrong " the Date cyclops on the earlier models is different as well ,, they were smaller than the ones the current pams have . I think the rep Date cyclops are in fact closer to the earlier Pams cheers yup. i believe 6MM vs the more common 7MM Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.