HauteHippie Posted February 18, 2007 Report Posted February 18, 2007 And here are a few.... Plenty more where these came from! I've been getting PMs, and to answer everyone - I'd really like to test fit these before shipping to anyone. Unfortunately I don't have a suitable watch on which to mount one of these in my hands at the moment so I'm trying to work something out... As soon as I do, I'll fill your orders. I can say right now that I'm quite happy with what I see when simply placing one of these cyclopes on top of a crystal. Distortion looks to be as well managed as I could hope for, and the magnification looks very good. As for the final specs, here you go: Diameter: 6.75 (6,75 to non USA members) mm. Thickness: ~1.22 mm Material: Sapphire AR Coating: None Magnification: 1.55x - 1.7x depending on rehaut The final diameter came up a hair under what I had originally intended. Without going into technical details, I ran up against an edge thickness requirement that became more stringent half way through production. So I had to make some adjustments. In order to not appreciably increase the total thickness or decrease the magnification strength of these lenses, I had to sacrifice a little in the way of diameter. Nevertheless, I feel these lenses are sized very appropriately. Stay tuned...
TJGladeRaider Posted February 19, 2007 Report Posted February 19, 2007 And here are a few.... Plenty more where these came from! I've been getting PMs, and to answer everyone - I'd really like to test fit these before shipping to anyone. Unfortunately I don't have a suitable watch on which to mount one of these in my hands at the moment so I'm trying to work something out... As soon as I do, I'll fill your orders. I can say right now that I'm quite happy with what I see when simply placing one of these cyclopes on top of a crystal. Distortion looks to be as well managed as I could hope for, and the magnification looks very good. As for the final specs, here you go: Diameter: 6.75 (6,75 to non USA members) mm. Thickness: ~1.22 mm Material: Sapphire AR Coating: None Magnification: 1.55x - 1.7x depending on rehaut The final diameter came up a hair under what I had originally intended. Without going into technical details, I ran up against an edge thickness requirement that became more stringent half way through production. So I had to make some adjustments. In order to not appreciably increase the total thickness or decrease the magnification strength of these lenses, I had to sacrifice a little in the way of diameter. Nevertheless, I feel these lenses are sized very appropriately. Stay tuned... Amazing - I was just asking Ziggy when a better date mag might become available for the PAMs. How about send me an e-mail - I think I need a couple of these. Bill
Pugwash Posted February 19, 2007 Report Posted February 19, 2007 Diameter: 6.75 (6,75 to non USA members) mm. As far as I know, it's just the French that use the comma for a decimal point ...
HauteHippie Posted February 19, 2007 Author Report Posted February 19, 2007 As far as I know, it's just the French that use the comma for a decimal point ... Here is a partial list of comma countries: Albania, Andorra, Argentina, Austria, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Belgium, Bolivia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Brazil, Bulgaria, Cameroon, Canada (French-speaking), Costa Rica, Croatia, Cuba, Chile, Colombia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Ecuador, Estonia, Faroes, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Greenland, Hungary, Indonesia, Iceland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg (uses both separators officially), Macedonia, Moldova, Netherlands, Norway, Paraguay, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Russia, Serbia, Slovakia, South Africa (officially, but decimal point is commonly used in business), Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, Ukraine, Uruguay, Venezuela, Vietnam, Zimbabwe Woops, I just crapped on my own thread.
sssurfer Posted February 19, 2007 Report Posted February 19, 2007 Great, Brian! My most heartfelt congratulations, these cyclopses are a beauty!
bertieng Posted February 19, 2007 Report Posted February 19, 2007 And here are a few.... Plenty more where these came from! I've been getting PMs, and to answer everyone - I'd really like to test fit these before shipping to anyone. Unfortunately I don't have a suitable watch on which to mount one of these in my hands at the moment so I'm trying to work something out... As soon as I do, I'll fill your orders. I can say right now that I'm quite happy with what I see when simply placing one of these cyclopes on top of a crystal. Distortion looks to be as well managed as I could hope for, and the magnification looks very good. As for the final specs, here you go: Diameter: 6.75 (6,75 to non USA members) mm. Thickness: ~1.22 mm Material: Sapphire AR Coating: None Magnification: 1.55x - 1.7x depending on rehaut The final diameter came up a hair under what I had originally intended. Without going into technical details, I ran up against an edge thickness requirement that became more stringent half way through production. So I had to make some adjustments. In order to not appreciably increase the total thickness or decrease the magnification strength of these lenses, I had to sacrifice a little in the way of diameter. Nevertheless, I feel these lenses are sized very appropriately. Stay tuned... Hi Chieftang, Is this the correct size for the Pam027 PR? Thanks.
HauteHippie Posted February 19, 2007 Author Report Posted February 19, 2007 Bertie, I'm sure there are exceptions, but I believe A series PAMs had 6mm cyclopes.
lagos1c Posted February 20, 2007 Report Posted February 20, 2007 Hi, I send you a PM. I'm a new member, I've got recently a new PAM00164 with a rubber strap band deployant.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now