TJGladeRaider Posted May 27, 2006 Report Share Posted May 27, 2006 I must say that it has been interesting to see all the statements regarding my assertion that a pressure test to 4ATM is the equivalent of 132 feet. It's pretty clear that there are few divers/pilots among us. I especially liked the one about the jello pudding . . . LOL If you're interested, I'll explain it - if you disagree with my explanation, please go here: Advice or, if that doesn't work: http://www.oracleinternational.com/advice/ One ATM is defined as a unit of pressure equal to the air pressure at sea level. It equals the amount of pressure that will support a column of mercury 760 millimeters high at 0 degrees Celsius under standard gravity, or 14.7 pounds per square inch (1.01325 × 105 pascals). As you go deeper under water (salt water), pressure increases at a rate of 14.7 pounds per sq inch (or 1 ATM) every 33 feet. It is different in fresh water (34 ft) and it would be a hell of a lot different in Jello Pudding. I must acknowledge that the guy who said that pressure testing to 4ATM should have been 99 feet. That is in error only because I was not clear and he would not have been misled had I explained things a little better - specifically, pressure testers are set up such that the scale begins at zero, as opposed to one, so when you add 4ATM, you are subjecting the watch to the equivalent of a 5ATM depth. Here is the relevant table. http://www.online.uillinois.edu/oakley/nitrox.html I hope that clears up any confusion. Bill Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miss Understood Posted May 27, 2006 Report Share Posted May 27, 2006 (edited) My dear William That is a lovely explanation. I venture the opinion that most people nowadays would think "automated teller machine" when faced with the acronym "ATM". Well said. Edited May 27, 2006 by Miss Understood Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TJGladeRaider Posted May 27, 2006 Author Report Share Posted May 27, 2006 My dear, that is a lovely explanation. Well said. Thank you Miss Understood, but the word "lovely" t'would be better applied to your countenace and classic coiffure. Bill Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Focker Posted May 28, 2006 Report Share Posted May 28, 2006 Great explanation! Many people also get off on tangents about dynamic pressures vs. static... pressure rises resulting from the swimming motion. Certainly there is a *tiny* difference but it's negligible. A friend of mine is a commercial diver. His deepest dives were to 1800' in chambers, wearing a genuine Sea-dweller. The SD is rated to 2000' and he wasn't the least bit worried about it flooding due to dynamic pressure differentials. Considering the 1/33 pressure difference between fresh and salt water, that should equate to 1,854 feet "fresh" ... even closer to 2000' limit, and no problems. PS: Bill said it! How'd we wind up with such a classy gal among this crowd of malcontents? If he was in a chamber, how the hell would his watch get wet? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
offshore Posted May 28, 2006 Report Share Posted May 28, 2006 Bell! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now