musicale Posted March 5, 2008 Report Posted March 5, 2008 Not that I'm an expert or anything, but just wondering... the Tri-compax module obviously adds thickness to the top of the movement causing the sunken datewheel problem. What if you removed these gears, and froze the gears at the 6 and 3 o'clock positions? Since most of us don't use the chronos anyway, and the seconds still remain at 9, wouldn't that solve the sunken datewheel issue? The big chrono second-hand would still move if you start the stopwatch, so if anyone wanted to take a quick look at it, it looks like the chrono still works.
andreww Posted March 5, 2008 Report Posted March 5, 2008 The Zigmeister commented on this the other day, although referring to the GMT module. Not possible, without swapping movements.
anton Posted March 5, 2008 Report Posted March 5, 2008 The only area that's really going to stay frozen is just the 3 o'clock area. Have a go at it if you do decide to do it, but it's not as simple as removing the gears. You'll also notice that the resulting hands will sit a little high and that would look a bit odd.
Rxus Posted March 5, 2008 Report Posted March 5, 2008 I'm as far from a watchsmith as anyone on this earth can be..but what is you were to simply use the 6,9,12 A7750 movement (native layout) on a tricompax 3.6.9 dial/watch? I'd like to think the date would line up and not be sunken in. And then simply freeze the non functioning 3 and 9 sub dials Sounds logical, but i'll let the experts chime in /humble bow
andreww Posted March 5, 2008 Report Posted March 5, 2008 That would require gluing a hand to the three o'clock subdial. I guess that would be the best solution for what he wants to accomplish though.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now