mastergod Posted November 30, 2008 Report Share Posted November 30, 2008 Hi guys, a call to those who are horologically enclined: I have seen the raising of hands on several vintage Pam projects, and need to do the same with the hands on a Accutron cal 214 "GMT" movement (as featured on the 1960 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RWG Technical Posted November 30, 2008 Report Share Posted November 30, 2008 You have to replace all the parts with longer ones, in other words a longer hour wheel, a longer cannon pinion, and a longer GMT gear. RG Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stilty Posted December 1, 2008 Report Share Posted December 1, 2008 2mm is a big jump. I don't think you will be able to find the parts to do this, without getting them custom made and that will cost you some big $$$. A quick glance at the 214 parts list shows the CP is available in 3 heights. 2.30mm, 2.44 mm, 2.69mm. It's not looking good I'm afraid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mastergod Posted December 1, 2008 Author Report Share Posted December 1, 2008 2mm is a big jump. I don't think you will be able to find the parts to do this, without getting them custom made and that will cost you some big $$$. A quick glance at the 214 parts list shows the CP is available in 3 heights. 2.30mm, 2.44 mm, 2.69mm. It's not looking good I'm afraid. Indeed. So if I got a 2.69 CP, would that mean that the minutes hand will be "vertically positioned" 2.69 mm over the movement? MG Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stilty Posted December 1, 2008 Report Share Posted December 1, 2008 2.69 is the total length of the CP It would depend on how deep the CP sits in the movement, and how tall the dial seat it. For example. On the ETA 2836-2, if your CP is 2.70, the height over the dial seat is 1.40. (Dial seat is basically the back of the dial, or where the dial rests on the movement.) So, if you subtract the thickness of the dial, typically 0.40, then the hand would sit 1.00 over the dial. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mastergod Posted December 2, 2008 Author Report Share Posted December 2, 2008 2.69 is the total length of the CP It would depend on how deep the CP sits in the movement, and how tall the dial seat it. For example. On the ETA 2836-2, if your CP is 2.70, the height over the dial seat is 1.40. (Dial seat is basically the back of the dial, or where the dial rests on the movement.) So, if you subtract the thickness of the dial, typically 0.40, then the hand would sit 1.00 over the dial. Thanks. Damn, I Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kronos twin Posted December 2, 2008 Report Share Posted December 2, 2008 I have to say you have my utmost respect for trying this. I have no idea why Accutron doesn't capitalize on making a larger watch, and hence, a larger watch case, for this new generation. Making a large Astronaut watch is a great idea. Best of luck. Truly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mastergod Posted December 2, 2008 Author Report Share Posted December 2, 2008 I have to say you have my utmost respect for trying this. I have no idea why Accutron doesn't capitalize on making a larger watch, and hence, a larger watch case, for this new generation. Making a large Astronaut watch is a great idea. Best of luck. Truly. Thanks. Its not a large Astronaut as such, rather a big, bad & ugly 1950 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now