mastergod

Hi all, Hope everybody's doing well. Interested in getting an UTC module for my gen Pluton but they're about USD 750 on the bay. Do we know a source of rep UTC modules? Thanks for any help! Best, MG

Hi all. Isn't this fantastic? Do we know if it's repped? Thanks!! MG

Heh! Thanks! Lol. Almost all my jackets are barbour. Love them. Ordered the gen from eBay yesterday!

Hi all, does anyone know a good source for a rep of the James Bond Skyfall (To Ki To) jacket? Don't want to buy gen as ebay is flooded with overpriced reps sold as gens and I'm uncertain about the sizes, too. So a rep that's sold as a rep would be the right thing to buy:-) Thanks!!! MG

Hi all, Having searched quite a lot, I'm asking for any help about how to buy an UTC module. Preferably working 24 hrs. Does anyone know where I can get one? Thanks for your tips:-) MG

Very interesting thread. I don't have the answer to the original question, but still I'd like to offer my perspective from the branding business. More important than a brand or product, is the question every human is subconsciously asking himself (often without being aware of it). This question is "who am I". Brands and products help people answer that question - to themselves and to others. I think Panerai's initial (1990's) appeal was that it was simple, bold, manly and had a kind of warrior aura to it. However many brands have exactly these specs. At the core of Panerai's appeal however, was uniqueness (mainly because of the crown guard). Also, the brand was new YET had a solid history. In my opinion, people who fought the first Panerai wave were independent people who felt special. People who didn't follow the herd. Maybe the core driver of the Panerai brand doesn't exist anymore. Rather, the opposite is the case. If you get a Panerai, you do follow. So maybe a person asking "who am I" won't look to Panerai for answer his question. I'm fully aware that this logic doesn't apply to the majority of the consumers, but changes start somewhere, and I feel that Panerai's lack of ability to answer "who am I" is the tip of the ice berg. That said, I believe Panerai will thrive for many years. Without the buzz and the energy. It would be - theoretically at least - impossible for any brand in any category to maintain their vitality and comparing to Rolex is impossible because Rolex was built under totally different circumstances. Just my 2 cents:-) MG

Wow, that's great. If only I was a hardcore fan I'd surely ask t buy one! Cheers MG

Hi all, just got a replacement bezel insert for said watch. It was too big! Afaik the SSD is 1:1 so I guess the Ebay seller's claim that his insert would fit just wasn't true. Any tips on an Ebay seller that has them would be greatly appreciated. Thanks! MG

UBOAT did that some years ago. I kind of like it but on the other hand it's a bit gimmicky and - fashion wise - too late perhaps 2c MG

Even in the unlikely event it was actually gen, IMO it's just a load of useless ugly krap

Hi all, haven't been shoppin since before many trusted sellers' websites were gunned down and believe I am wasting a lot of time searching for a v2 Ploprof. I'd would be greatly appreciated if one of us would kindly post a link so I can order a v2 for Xmas. Thanks a lot! MG

a link to Josh please! Cant find him in the jungle of Chanels stopped sites :-) mg

Blasting rocks, and Panerai know it, as his finish been around your yonks, especially (in this context) among antique PAM instruments, is it fair to assert that the reason they don't bead blast watches (but rather achieve dull looks with Tantalium or Titanium) is that they are thinking like a fashion brand rather than a tool brand? My thinking as a fan is - Pam should have offered blasted pieces..lemme think...around 2005 !? MG

As a designer, I am fascinated and awestruck by the fact that Panerai issues so many "same but different" products at such scale, with such great share of voice and success. It surely is unique and amazing if you think about it. Indeed, the CEO said "it's easy" in an interview a couple of years back; subtle changes within a matrix. No dissin' here folks - I really am amazed. A date window on a model that didn't have one, an embossed maiale logo, something new on the CB - - a supreme and very contemporary brand exercise that isn't cannibalizing or deflating the brand - well done!

Loving this... mg

Hope I'm not breaking the rules but this thread seems the right place to ask: Do we know anything about the Pelagos progress? cheers mg

Mock-up of a fantasy version of an original fake Better make that Oyster Perpetual, not Oyster Anyway - opinions? mg big brother of

AFAIK it's one piece. I guess the whole piece could be blackened provided sufficient grail-motivation was present :-)

Whether or not to be true to the original design of a fantasy watch is an interesting dilemma in which a large array of considerations and motivations come into play... My first plan is to sing my own tune by deciding a US Marine Rolex turned into a Rolex Commando. Then, having collected the right parts, probably go "gen Tudor fantasy" But you know what they say about ugly ducklings. Some become swans, other just remain ugly. With watches, IMHO this translates to the feeling you get when you put it on or take it off, whether it "connects". So if after that it still gets no wrist time, it will be traded off and loved by an RWG or HF fellow enthusiast :-) mg

I guess maybe they only turn up now and then. Allegedly from an estate sale, mg

lol I only got the case set, will have to source the rest...

Realizing that it is the "Tudor 7206" variety of this fantasy watch. mg

Hi all, here are some US Marine (off the bay) iphone shots and first impressions. First of all, the bezel is non-click and I mean really non-click, as if it's broken. I am able to lift it 1-2 mililimeters with my fingernails (it is held down by the (in lack of a proper term) weird lug thingies. Apart from that, it seems pretty good. The caseback used to have Tudor 7200 engraved. Also, a watchsmith has written GE04/07 and perhaps14217XXX next to it (by hand, over 7200), and 10/06 under 7200. Somehow, the caseback seems very substantial. Bracelet - I don't know. Definitely incorrect for this watch, but uncertain wether or not its gen, probably not (?) Will take more pics later:-) mg

I agree. Prolly get a gen actually, in order to respect it proper. mg