freddy333 Posted January 17, 2009 Report Posted January 17, 2009 I posted this pic of 1 of my 6239s in early November Today, I spied this pic (taken a few days ago) posted on a gen site
Daytona4me Posted January 17, 2009 Report Posted January 17, 2009 Maybe he will do a trade with you as compensation for copying your artistry ?
coolfire Posted January 17, 2009 Report Posted January 17, 2009 Nah... Freddy, his sucks... even if it's a gen. Yours looks way better.
mikellem Posted January 17, 2009 Report Posted January 17, 2009 Freddy, I would take it as a compliment!
Shundi Posted January 17, 2009 Report Posted January 17, 2009 Phs...nice...they [censored] about illegal copying and then do it themselves... hypocrisy at it's finest.
freddy333 Posted January 17, 2009 Author Report Posted January 17, 2009 they bitch about illegal copying and then do it themselves... hypocrisy at it's finest. Exactly.
Guest Sql_pl Posted January 17, 2009 Report Posted January 17, 2009 Hmm maybe it was just a coincidence. A pic with the mirror is not that rare idea I think. But still I think your looks better!
ifly65 Posted January 19, 2009 Report Posted January 19, 2009 Shooting watches and jewelry on a reflective surface is a common method used by pros for web and print ads. There are differences in the photos...lighting, color correction, dial area shown, reflection of watches...etc. Chances are the person that took the gen photo never even saw freddy's photo...a coincidence.
Bazz Posted January 19, 2009 Report Posted January 19, 2009 I would say it's a coincidence as it's a very common theme in watch photography, be it the refection of the face or the case back PS'ed behind it. Here is a similar pic I had taken from early 2007,
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now